this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
700 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

What are the genuine use cases for such a robot? For when the kid has issues communicating with other people?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago

I would like to think the community could work out the API's and replicate them on a free server, but if this was just a glorified Alexa box, there is probably a lot more server-side processing that needs to happen to keep it running.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

I guess this device needed to connect to some remotely hosted server that enabled its functionality. And the company was losing money and hoping that sales would eventually pick up enough to make them profitable. But their latest investor decided not to put any more money in, and the company ran out of cash and can't pay its bills anymore.

The entrepreneur thought he could get more investor cash and ran the business in such a way that it would fall off a cliff if he didn't. And... He failed to secure more financing.

I have mixed feelings about products like this... If the device somehow needed to host an entire internet's worth of data to function, it certainly wouldn't have cost only $800. But when you buy a product that depends on the ongoing viability of the seller, you're in a position of caveat emptor - You better vet them out yourself, especially if they're new.

Hopefully the founders feel some emotional attachment to their product and the trust bestowed upon them by their unknowing customers, and release whatever on the back end makes the thing work so that motivated customers could reactivate their devices somehow.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I already experienced this with that one small robot a few years ago. It was resurrected a few years later but required a subscription.

That was the beginning of me not caring for subscription based products and being weary of products that relied on servers instead of being locally hosted.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Man those parents. Oof.

I do not wanna be in their shoes.

Telling your kid that needed an emotional support robot friend that the robot friend is going to take a nap for a long time and might not wake back up? Ooo boy.

Helping a kid through a divorce is hard enough. This seems like a terrifying nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair, electronics break all the time, and living pets die eventually - both things everyone needs to learn how to cope with, including children. This is just the Venn Diagram of those two pieces of reality.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 163 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

All companies should be required to release their entire codebase under the GPL if the product is no longer going to be maintained by them.

That way a community of people who actually care can maintain and improve it.

I play several games that run on 20+ year old engines, long since abandoned by their original creators. The community reverse engineered the games and server infrastructure so they can still be run and enjoyed today. Same for all the folks who develop emulators and the entire ecosystem of ROM dumpers, readers, and handhelds that surround them.

Capitalism is a cancer. So amazing that, at least in certain parts of the software world, we have something better.

This is also a friendly reminder to donate to and support your favorite FOSS projects! they need all the help they can get. ❤️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

um,,, my favorite streamer Pirate Software says it is impossible for corporations to provide code to extend the life of anything

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They sometimes use the IP of others and it can be a real headache or impossible to get permission from everyone.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This argument seems hollow, releasing source code is not an all or nothing situation. They can just release what they are allowed to, and let the community replace the missing stuff.

Releasing anything is better than releasing nothing and letting the community reverse engineer everything instead of just some third-party libraries.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Understandable

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry Sally, Geoffrey has to die because a company wanted to make their products utterly dependent on their servers. We'll bury him in the yard next to Gertrude.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›