this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
272 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Despite Donald Trump’s promise to avoid Social Security cuts, recent signals from the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, suggest reductions may be forthcoming.

The department, aimed at streamlining federal spending, has sparked concern among advocates worried about potential impacts on the program.

Trump’s mixed messaging and DOGE’s focus on cost-cutting have intensified scrutiny as officials prepare policy recommendations.

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Goweff department - not doge. Why let him spit on doge and use that name?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Go ahead. Fuck with people's money, or expectations of money. See how far that gets you. Culture wars are one thing, and don't affect everyone, but cold hard cash is very real to most people. I fucking dare them.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

We’re starving and CEOs are back on the menu.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Fine. But pay me back what I paid into it the past 30 years along with its gains.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Thats our money. We paid into it. They are stealing from us.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All rich people steal. This is nothing new.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is the correct take away. They’re using it to fund further tax cuts to the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

I wonder if we can sue them for taking this from us. I mean, I been paying into that for twelve fucken years. A lot of others have put a lot more in.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Two wealthy billionaire immigrants hired to pilfer American livelihood because the Government borrowed and bet from our Social Security— and lost the money. Now they see no other way out of insolvency.

Certainly Elon and Vivek aren’t going to start paying their fair share of taxes, so it’s steal from the poor and give to the rich.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I wonder if Trump is going to pay back the $1.3 trillion that W "borrowed" from the fund?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wait, is he using his kid as a human shield now? Not one time has he been holding a child now suddenly it's part of his wardrobe. Lmfao.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, he's a real piece of shit

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Oh, I'm trying to find the video of the cartoon where the bad guy is using a hostage as a shield and he's perfectly moving them around to track the good guys gun. Was it Venture Brothers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To all old voters who wanted Trump: HA!! HA!! HA!!

Enjoy your sentencing from this clown.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It won’t hit the elderly, they’ll cut based on current age. It’s anyone under 40 that’ll be fucked.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Time to start stocking up on riot supplies.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Like anyone will even care about what’s happening to them?

Just look at recent surveys, where economic sentiment is basically political opinion now, not how people are actually fairing: https://www.axios.com/2024/12/06/trump-economy-democrats-republicans-inflation

The metric was not like that before.

But we are in an era where influencers, feeds and whims trump reality and fact. I thought COVID-19 proved that, but it’s pretty much irrefutable now, and people (on average) are going to care less about what’s physically taken away than how some angry influencer makes them feel about it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Maybe people will start to pay attention when their retirements are stolen from them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›