And that seed grew and bloomed into...
1-star reviews for a McDonalds in Pennsylvania
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
957 points (98.5% liked)
Antiwork
8377 readers
3 users here now
-
We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.
-
We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.
Partnerships:
- Matrix/Element chatroom
- Discord (channel: #antiwork)
- IRC: #antiwork on IRCNow.org (i.e., connect to ircs://irc.ircnow.org and
/join #antiwork) - Your facebook group link here
- Your x link here
- lemmy.ca/c/antiwork
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Who the fuck is Brian Thompson?? Let's just go ahead and keep saying "the CEO" agreed?
Agreed. Who cares which CEO? They're all garbage humans.
takes seed and gives it a single gentle kiss
then plants it in the rainforest I'm growing under my house
...it just sounds like you kissed your phone and then flushed it down the toilet into the septic tank....
That's all well and good, but don't just sit back and hope that healthcare magically improves, or that other healthcare CEO's start getting their life claims denied.
Take the current well of anger, and point it towards politicians that will actually fight for free healthcare. It's not only a public health emergency, but also a "crime" emergency, and one of safety.
It's easy to sit behind a keyboard and laugh. It's slightly harder to sit behind a keyboard and email your local reps. It's again slightly harder to rally at your local reps office hours or town halls for free healthcare.
Neither adventurism nor reformism works, what does work is revolution, which requires organization.
Nah let's shoot more CEOs. Let's frighten the fuck out of executives until they bend to our wills.
And how will that help those that are struggling with healthcare costs? Frankly, I'm shocked it's taken this long for America to shoot the shit out of these cunts, but you've shot one dude - and a new CEO is probably rubbing their hands with glee with replacing them and getting that big fat bonus.
Make the change that will help people, rather than the one that satisfies your exec-level death kink.
That won't really work. They'll surround themselves with private security, stop going to public places, and if things get bad enough pass gun control laws to disarm the proles.
Random acts of violence will never bend them to our wills. We need to be organized.
You are absolutely right, random acts of violence will result in more problems. That's why: "You know, if you had one day, like one real rough, nasty day, one rough hour, and I mean real rough, the word will get out and it will end immediately. End immediately. You know, it'll end immediately."
To take advantage of this seed, I made an introductory Marxist reading list. Without learning theory, there can be no real revolutionary movement that doesn't stumble over countless avoidable pitfalls.
Very noble, thank you.
No problem! 🫡
"There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning."
- Warren Buffett
I mean... they're quite open about it.
"The enemy is neither left nor right, they are above."
They're always on the right dude.
While I don't disagree that right wing assholes have been gleefully ruining everything for pretty much my entire adult life, the billionaires are the puppet-masters orchestrating the entire show, and no matter which side wins, they always come out on top. That's by design. We can't fight a class war when we're at each other's throats constantly and too distracted fighting an ideological culture war that has been raging for decades.
Anybody who is gung-ho about this red team or blue team shit is unknowingly a mercenary footsoldier in the billionaire class war against the poor. We need to start caring less about whether our ninety-nine-percenter neighbor is flying a Trump flag or a Biden flag and start caring more about the point-oh-one percent of fat cats picking our pockets and getting away with it.
Maybe this will clear it up: Biden is right-wing.
I figured I'd dig a bit and find the source. It's from a 2006 NYT article. Here's the quote in context:
It turned out that Mr. Buffett, with immense income from dividends and capital gains, paid far, far less as a fraction of his income than the secretaries or the clerks or anyone else in his office. Further, in conversation it came up that Mr. Buffett doesn’t use any tax planning at all. He just pays as the Internal Revenue Code requires. “How can this be fair?” he asked of how little he pays relative to his employees. “How can this be right?”
Even though I agreed with him, I warned that whenever someone tried to raise the issue, he or she was accused of fomenting class warfare.
“There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”
This quote is nominally about the ruling class manipulating the state for their own benefits. However, I don't think he would do away with class as a Marxist revolution would. Rather, he thinks class warfare would end when the rich are taxed a proportion equal to the working class. The state would still exist in service of the bourgeois, ownership of the means of production would still be theirs, and society would still be shaped by them.
capitalism can work if it's regulated and everyone pays their fare share, but as we all know -- that's not actually capitalism. Still, a lot of people believe in that system and think it can continue to operate as long as the corruptible elements of it are mitigated
Capitalism cannot work even if its regulated and people taxed higher, it cannot outpace the tendency for the rate of profit to fall, and this tendency forces companies to raise absolute profits through centralization and international hyper-exploitation, both of which have limits. Furthermore, that's still Capitalism, as Capital is still superior to Humanity, rather than the reverse.
Regulations are always, inevitably, destroyed by capitalism. Even when it's in the market's best interests, capitalism still needs ever increasing profits for capitalism to function. As the rate of profit declines the capitalists have to go after the very regulations that capitalism needed to work in the first place.
I think as the capital owning class is the ruling class, then it's capitalism even if everyone pays an equivalent share to the state. I think the crux of the issue is if there is a group of people who can meet their living needs without having to sell their labor.
The disabled and impoverished benefiting from societal programs are not the issue, Capitalists are.
Don't worry, mine's been growing and blooming for years. Hopefully, I can help others' seeds grow as well.
What an interesting thing to observe. The United States health insurance system is such a complete f****** disaster, and a great many Americans know that, but many of those Americans also feel that the US is the best country in the world. So there is this cognitive dissonance where people are angry but some still won't admit that maybe Canada and the UK and Japan and dozens of other countries are all doing it better.
And if you're unwilling to recognize a systemic failure, then maybe the best you can do is hope for a hero or at least some kind of vigilante warrior to come along and dispense justice or karma or whatever you want to call it.
Canada and the UK and Japan and dozens of other countries are all doing it better.
Propaganda has that one covered:
"There are people in Canada that wait months and months to see a doctor for serious problems!"
It's the most common thing I hear when I discuss healthcare with anyone... "But the waittttssss!"
But reality has the response covered:
Many European countries has a max wait time of 90 days for non-emergency elective surgery. If the wait is longer than that at a public hospital, the patient can choose to have the surgery done at a private hospital if there's room at no additional cost. Emergencies are always treated immediately, of course. You can also choose to have a private top-up health insurance plan if you wish to always be treated at private hospitals.
That's because conservatives are very individualistic for whatever reason. Instead of seeing systemic issues they see bad apples.
They don't see health insurance as a flawed concept that is made to exploit them, they see it as a system that got corrupted by the "elite" (aka the Jews, probably)
That's because conservatives are very individualistic for whatever reason. Instead of seeing systemic issues they see bad apples.
Because conservatism inherently relies on fear of change, simple thinking, and avoiding the discomfort of questioning the status quo at all costs. You want to believe that everything is hunky-dory the way it is, and avoid thinking too hard about all the ways it might not be.
It's uncomfortable to think that the system you're participating in and benefitting from might be the cause of it. No one ever wants to think they're the bad guy. It's the reason they hate stuff like CRT so much, because it's an incredibly uncomfortable thought to imagine that everything they've known and tried to maintain is actually a complete nightmare and they've been part of it in some way.
The world is much scarier when you see the pain and suffering so many experience, and it's through no fault of their own. No matter what they do or didn't do, some people just get dealt a shit hand, either by chance, or because of systemic issues. It's much easier to say "The system I believe in is totally fine and just, it's their fault they haven't been able to reach the same place I have".
It's always been a class war. The billionaires have been using the news media they own to keep us from figuring out where the REAL source of our pain comes from.
If they can keep us distracted with bullshit and fighting among ourselves, then they can keep running off with all the f*cking money.
That's why I made an introductory Marxist reading list, without theory people have a general idea of who the big bad is but no way to combat that, and in doing so leftist infighting becomes one of the principle issues.
view more: next ›