You wanna be the party of law and order. Then this is just part of the order. The law part can only come after.
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
147 points (100.0% liked)
News
23634 readers
2432 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
We all better get tax credits when they don’t release it
Leak it you cowards.
The fact that there are people who don't want to release it means it's pretty damning. You don't try to bury reports that imply your party member is innocent.
What's the point of wasting tax payer dollars on an ethics report you're going to bury??
I mean they got Gaetz to resign so they weren't wasted.
Didn't he won the re election? He's going to be there again on the next congress. He basically just took a vacation.
Oh. Then you got me there that was a waste of tax money.
The tax payer dollars spent on compiling the report weren't wasted.
The cost in both salaries and hours of a Congress that's probably about to adjourn for the year debating the release that should have happened the moment it was completed, on the other hand..
Is it irony that they're debating releasing an ethics report about a scumbag?
It shouldn't matter it is a scumbag or not. Either the report exonerates him, or he wasn't acting ethically which we should know about. Either way there should be no discussion whether or should be released or not.
The fact that this is debated, says that there major ethical issues among people deciding about it.
I look at it this way: this was work done by a governing body, who were elected to perform the work. This wasn't an FBI criminal investigation. It was a legislative ethics investigation on another legislator.
There is no earthly reason this should not be available to the public, no matter how innocent the report is.
And all of tax funded.
No. It would be irony for an ethics committee to be the subject of an ethics investigation. For a scumbag, it's just expected.
Just like rain on your wedding day.
Or a free ride when you've already paid