this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
170 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2031 readers
810 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Georgia Department of Public Safety confirmed that Tennessee state Sen. Ken Yager (R) was arrested for driving under the influence after a hit-and-run crash on Tuesday.

Link to the video: https://xcancel.com/NC5/status/1864345934479372472

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'd soil myself too if a US cop confronts me

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

This is the kind of thing that used to be made fun of about ruasia.

The world is changed i feel it in the web

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Only sending their best! (Literally)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Why do US cops not have simple hand-held breathalyzers? Spent all the money on guns?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They do. But they often insist on sobriety tests anyways, because it helps them gather circumstantial/subjective evidence against you. Basically, a breathalyzer will objectively say if you’re over the limit, but a sobriety test allows the cop to feel like you’re over the limit and arrest you even if you’re not.

The breathalyzer removes any subjective doubt, so cops will often use it to confirm when they obviously know someone is over the limit. But they don’t start with it, because keeping that subjective doubt as long as possible means they can keep probing for other reasons to support an arrest in the meantime.

Basically, imagine you’re an investigator doing an interview. Your job is to arrest this person, even if they have done nothing wrong. If you open the interview with a breathalyzer, you remove any doubt about their sobriety when they blow a 0.00. But if you start with a sobriety test and they “fail” (by your subjective, totally 100% biased opinion) then you can initiate the arrest before you even breathalyze them.

And even if they blow a 0.00, you can say that they’re high instead, (because they “failed” your sobriety test), and arrest them to take a drug test back at the police station. Since the drug test isn’t testing for active impairment, (it’s just testing whether or not they’ve done drugs in the past few days/weeks) there is a much higher chance that they’ll turn up positive on the drug test even if they’re sober. But again, you don’t actually care if they’re sober; You just care that you got the arrest, and that they pissed hot on a drug test back at the station because they smoked weed last week.

Americans do have the right to refuse a sobriety test, and they should! Cops will push and make it sound mandatory, but it’s not. Just insist on being breathalyzed instead. Because a field sobriety test (even if you’re stone cold sober) will only help the police form a case against you. And under your fifth amendment rights, you’re not required to help the police build a case against you. Field sobriety tests are the “I’m saying I caught a whiff of weed coming from the vehicle, so I can justify ripping your entire car apart on the side of the road even if I don’t find anything during the search” of DUI stops. Cops will use it to justify an arrest even if you have done nothing wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Tennessee doesn't use breathalyzers. If you fail the field sobriety test you get taken to the nearest hospital to get your blood tested.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In addition to the reasons already stated, breathalyzers aren't accurate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

They are more accurate than these field sobriety tests for the initial check.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Why do a simple thing like use a scientifically tested device when you can humiliate and waste the time of the individual, in the hopes they will do something even more incriminating and possibly result in you having to (murder) subdue them with force, with the added benefit of paid leave while they investigate that you did nothing wrong?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

wat? They do. Sometimes they just don't need one, arrest for PC, transport to jail and administer the more accurate, definitely certified desktop version.

I've been asked to perform the stupid human tricks and refused. I asked for portable breathalyzer. 0.0%, went on my way.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I give it 3 days before he's appointed to a Trump Admin cabinet position!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

is dot secretary still open?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

he just clinched his reelection, looks like

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago

in b4 "HE'S BEING TARGETED BECAUSE HE'S A REPUBLICAN. THE LIBS HATE HIM AND ARE TARGETING HIM UNFAIRLY"

Truth be told, I bet dumpy will take him in. He likes getting pissed on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

He is the liquor

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago

This is pretty much how every GOP looks to me.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Anyone have a non xitter link to the video of the field sobriety test?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That man has definitely soiled himself. I wonder if he even noticed. He was doing a few side steps and leans.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

He's gone full Lehey.