this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4112 readers
183 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Australian Senate, last sitting of the year. No idea when the Social Media Ban debate is kicking off.

If anyone's keen, feel free to give a live run-down of anything interesting in this thread.

(sorry about all the edits, just trying to get a decent thumbnail: elevated photo of the Australian Senate)

(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Too many kids die over this shit. The corpos have had, what, 15 years (?) to sort this shit out.

So now we see the heavy handed government regulation coming along. That’s what happens.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)

mark the names of the dumb cunts that yes'd

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

We should ban u16s from public transport. Too many have had fatal accidents due to dangerous behaviour around railways and bus stops. Compulsory learning from home, now!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you think that’s a solid argument or one based in logic, good news. You’d probably make for an ideal liberal senator.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Satire, I thought it was obvious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

~~Welp went over my head, my bad, imma blame it on Poe’s law or something~~ satirical but critical of the bill my point stands.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, @[email protected] was being critical of the Bill. Because it's about as well thought-out as their satirical banning of children on public transport.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The info is still really vague but seemed to so far apply to big platforms like reddit and facebook and X - however my info might be outdated by now.

Then again it could be that the fines for non compliance and verification charges might also apply to smaller platforms with less available funding than the big companies, and push them under.

The info I’ve been reading seems to be inconsistent and sometimes even conflict. And yeah, could be outdated by now

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The relevant Minister will be able to give exemptions as needed, but unfortunately there is no threshold for any sort of minimum size requirement or for non-profit community groups. So we would probably, to be completely lawful, need to get chummy with some politicians who can reach out to the Minister and seek an exemption.

(But realistically, we're probably small enough that nobody would notice.)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

it's seriously annoying as fuck how there's no exemption for any of these internet regulations based on size, all it it seriously achieves is strengthening corpos and depowering individuals with souls

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

They prolly don't know it exists. If they do, be prepared to switch instance as I doubt lodion will want to deal with Id checking

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (7 children)

It's not even clear yet what form the ID checking will take. They've rushed this through way too fast and without proper consultation. But there does seem to be some sort of a plan that the ID checking would be done by a government service in some manner, rather than users needing to send ID directly to the platform.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Last I saw the suggestions were drivers license or equivalent, face scan, or digital id. They’ve probably walked that back though or will do so because hell nah

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"are you over 16" clicks yes well your honour they clearly provided false data so it's not our farkin' problem.

because honestly what fucking 16 year old has a proof of age card

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Govt service, or privatised age-assurance face-scanning service wrought with error?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Like I said, it's not clear yet what form it will take.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I, and at least one other person here sent submissions in specifically mentioning the fediverse.

Mine wasn't a very technical submission, i tried to focus on the value and potential destruction of that value if safeguards aren't allowed for nascent social media.

So at least there is a record of it. My worry is all the Muskivites submissions will drown out ones like mine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I'll take that as a no

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Call of duty lobbies mentioned in senate. What a time to be alive lmao

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Yes, and rightly so. Because this bill is so immensely stupid and the process by which it has been enacted so deeply undemocratic, that even a moron like Canavan (or was it Antic?) can see that the way they've carved out exemptions is haphazard and poorly thought through.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Faaark, I'm agreeing with Malcolm Roberts!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

"Comrade! Papers! NOW!"

I remember when we used to be horrified at some of the terrible regimes and their draconian requirements and powers.

And yet, here we are happily strolling into the same situation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I don’t see how the communist remark is relevant. Social media has proliferated largely unchecked. They are potentially damaging platforms, especially for younger people. That’s ignoring the rampant misinformation. I mean have a look at X and the “your body my choice” nonsense. I’m surprised people are genuinely advocating for the multimillion dollar corporations being in charge rather than our government.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (9 children)

It's a wild overstep peddled in the name of "think of the children!!"

As any 12 year old with a porno mag will tell you, kids will get around this without even blinking. And the fun fact is that I, a grown arse adult three times their "acceptable" age to fuck around with the dangerous social media will coincidentally be asked to prove my age, full name, address to any comment I may make online and boy oh boy wait until I say something that disagrees with the obsidian order.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (7 children)

This comment right here. Not a fan of this bill at all and may potentially leave any platform that demands this information and/or ‘digital id’.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But that's the problem, this bill does absolutely nothing to rectify that. They could try and hold the companies to account (good luck with Elon on Trumps team), or even better, they could snap back to reality and actually look at educating kids how to navigate and use these online spaces.

Do you think that kids at 16, suddenly getting access with no prior experience or knowledge of how the systems work will be better?

  1. We have existing regulation about media and who can watch it, we should update this and apply it as well as we can to new technologies.
  2. Children should be taught how to verify information and utilise online spaces healthily, like it or not, these spaces will be around in some form.
  3. Parents should be taught how to work with their children and should be held accountable, same as if i let my 13 yr old go to an R rated movie.

There are much worse places than instagram and tiktok, that won't be following any government recommendations. This bill does nothing but enhance the surveillance state, as everyone will be required to verify their identity, what the government is really doing is fighting online anonymity, but please just think of those poor little kids.

I agree with all your criticism of social media, I hate it (this is the only platform I am on) but if they pass this bill, social media will still be round, fucking up the world, just the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Debate's kicked off.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›