this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32351 readers
398 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Bring back sumptuary laws!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The Earth only can survive with Humans with Humanity, it's not only the rich, it's ignorance, stupidity, fanatism and greed the problem. It's all the stupid people which vote for those which give power to the rich (MAGA rednecks, fascists, flat earther, anti-vax, influencers "Climate change is a Hoax", buyed media fom these people with fake news, etc.).

The bottom line is not that someone is rich, but what he do with the wealth and how he earned it..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Voting for Democrats is also voting for those that give power to the rich. But this must be looked at in the larger context of the U.S. political system, which shows that it’s not a problem of voters but of the essence of the state itself.

All of the issues in your analysis were explained over a century ago: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

Yes US is different, because it isn't a real Democracy, with 2 Partys, one conservative neoliberal and other extreme right wing christo-fascists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 35 minutes ago

It's all the stupid people which vote for those which give power to the rich (MAGA rednecks

Clearly you weren’t talking ab the U.S. or implying the legitimacy of U.S. democracy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

we need to consume the rich. There's no other way

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 55 minutes ago

only if you don't believe in guillotines.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Can Earth Support a Human Future? Maybe, If the Rich ~~Consume Less~~ gets consumed

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Given their diet. Pretty sure that would increase methane production.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

I reckon Earth probably can support an ant future for quite a bit longer than apes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Instead of waiting for them to break their 400th consecutive pinky promise to consume less, how about No More Rich?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Time to reset the initial conditions, and this time, make sure there are safeguards to prevent this level of inequality happening again.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 hours ago

Socialism is the only answer.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Can Earth support a human future? Maybe, if we kill more rich people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You have to redistribute that wealth with socialism, killing the people who currently possess it will just create new billionaires, it won't solve the problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

You can have redistribution without socialism. There was a modest amount of redistribution even under Eisenhower.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Well thats an interesting idea: how many more people can the earth support for each billionaire