this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Windows

405 readers
26 users here now

For all things Windows.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Pretty sure I can sell my laptop for that amount

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

in tiny fonts: the data you upload to the cloud will be used for AI training purposes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago

Yet people keep making fun of Apple for putting the power button on the bottom.

At least it works offline.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

This makes less than no sense, for $349 you can easily buy a computer that can stream a desktop, hell any computer capable of streaming another computer is inherently capable of offline work, this has absolutely no value add to anyone except Microsoft and not even that since people can make literally any other choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

No matter what we said about it. There will be people who will eagerly put their mouth on Microsoft's asshole, waiting to swallow any removed products that Microsoft shit out

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

My Thinkpad T440p cost less then half that and many mini PCs cost around that much.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

This is getting closer to the meme about the Javascript-based streamed operating system.

The only explanation I will now accept for how pointlessly laggy Windows can be is that Microsoft was deliberately increasing the latency to prepare customers for an online-only OS. Curse them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

You can get an x86_64 mini pc for that same price. Or you can buy a used mid gaming rig for that same price.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

Why is it so expensive? You can buy a fully functioning laptop with a local windows install for way less.

Even the new mac mini is $599 and that's a full on computer with really good performance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

Jesus Christ..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

And if you thought Microsoft could not get worse...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago

Oh...so they just want to take all control away from the user? I won't be buying that, I'm sure it eats up a fuck ton of bandwidth too

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago

It has begun

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

But it's a new and revolutionary thin client. It's got 365 in the name, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's new and revolutionary in that it's worthless because you can only run Microsoft shit on this and makes you lock yourself 100% in with a vendor notorious for not giving a single shit about customers

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

99.9% of consumers couldn't care less.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nice, more e-waste... Also, if it's just streaming from the cloud, how is it so expensive? Its on the same range as a steam deck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

😎 profit, synergy, enterprise, buzzword.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Words can't express how much I don't want this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The article mentions this is aimed at enterprises who are already probably doing something like this with vmware ESXi

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

Doubt it'll ever catch on with anything except maybe the largest of orgs. You can just procure office task ready machines so cheaply these days, and Windows 365 is like $45/user/month. Far more than what we pay for windows licensing, user Cals, and office licensing all combined.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

Yep for managing "thin clients" I'd been expecting something like this someday.