this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35831 readers
1068 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You likely can't. The reason being the patents for the technology are owned by patent trolls who refuse to let them be used.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

But despite Myhrvold’s enthusiasm, the Photonic Fence hasn’t been all that easy to actually build. It’s taken years of development to figure out how to continuously track and identify a specific type of insect and then dispatch it safely and efficiently. For instance, for the demonstration, I had to wear protective goggles since that type of laser is not safe for your eyes; I was assured that when it’s market-ready, the laser they deploy will not potentially blind human passersby. And no one has yet worked out how to make the device cheap enough to be useful in the places it is most needed, places where most people’s mosquito-defense system consists of sleeping under nets every night.

You mean the patent on an item where they haven't figured out how to make it work yet without blinding its users? Yeah, it's definitely patent trolls and not user safety /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Pulled it out of their ass. There aren't patents for mosquito lasers or what have you. The idea is just moronic. It is a fun engineering challenge but ultimately doesn't transfer to the real world. You cannot scale it. It is dangerous. It is expensive to keep running / maintained. It has a direct competitor that works 100x better in the form of pesticide / poisons. Also a mosquito net works wonders, is scalable, cheap and efficient.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You were saying?

The technology has existed for well over a decade now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 59 minutes ago

@[email protected]:

You cannot scale it. It is dangerous. It is expensive to keep running / maintained.

Your source:

for the demonstration, I had to wear protective goggles since that type of laser is not safe for your eyes; And no one has yet worked out how to make the device cheap enough to be useful in the places it is most needed, places where most people’s mosquito-defense system consists of sleeping under nets every night.

You were saying?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The Gates Foundation has something like this 20 years ago. It used the sounds of wing beats to find and identify gender and species.

It is unclear why nothing came of it. I look it up every few years....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

Probably haven't solved the issue of friendly fire, i.e. potentially blinding users.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

The real story is how easy it is for bullshit to go viral.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't doubt a laser could fry a mosquito; but could a mosquito actually be seen on radar? I would think LIDAR would be better at detecting such a small thing, and even then...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Astronomers track centimeter-sized rocks up in space. Tracking a mosquito in the same room is not an issue. The rest of the "invention" is the problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Doubt anything like that id available for sale. He took the radar from a car, probably needed some serious tweaking to get it to track smaller objects and ignore larger ones.

If you have any military connections, get your hands on a AN/APG-81 from an F-35 and cook all the mosquitos in the room. Get any pets or food out first, of course.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I have my doubts. Cool in concept, but getting a radar that is that sensitive and able to track quick movements seems difficult.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

It looks like it's just using an SR04 ultrasonic sensor too which isn't even that precise.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Oh damn I had an idea of doing this just recently. Turned out to be a huge hassle for someone without experience and also dangerous to have a laser that can burn flying mosquitoes ready to potentially burn your eyes out or house down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Build it in a fire-brick tunnel enclosure, with slow release CO2 , or IR light attractant.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Would they be dangerous to mount them on sharks ? asking for a friend.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

7 years in evil medical school and all you get are some crummy sea bass...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

You need more capital. One ~~million~~... billion dollars oughta do it.