this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4094 readers
10 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Is this good or bad?

Edit: Good

A scheme to transfer freight from road to rail has cut 64,300 truck journeys from roads in its first year, according to a port operator.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's definitely good, but I do wonder (and worry) whether increased usage of rail contributes at all to the increasingly abysmal passenger rail services; when you look at the data, it's horrific how overloaded the train lines are due to chronic under-investment.

That being said, even if this scheme was impacting passenger rail, it's probably still good overall, especially if it leads to more investment in infrastructure (i.e. passenger rail being drastically involved in the future); I have plenty of beef with Starmer's Labour, but I also recognise that the trains getting as bad as they are now didn't happen overnight, so will take time to improve. (Which reminds me: I should read more about the recent budget)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

One of HS2's huge benefits will be taking large amounts of passenger traffic off the ECML, freeing it up for more freight. Just gotta hope 2a gets un-cancelled...

(Which is why I get grumpy when headlines scream "it'll only save 30 minutes": It's not the only reason!)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

also like 30 minutes is a fucking chunky saving, usually with public transport you're talking saving like 3 minutes! 30 minutes can very well be what makes services usable for way more people, getting them to switch from car to train.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

Didn't they sell off a bunch of the land that was going to be used for that? I remember being very upset at how spiteful of a gesture it felt

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

About time? The solution had been staring them right in the face since the beginning.