this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
508 points (97.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27193 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The worse the UI is, the more often users will have to click/tap stuff, which boosts the "engagement" stats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

YouTube is free, accessible and innovative, though? That meme doesn't make a lot of sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Genuinely curious what parts of the UI have gotten worse. Open video, video plays, move on.

It's obvious that Google would rather try to make money than bleed it into one of the most expensive websites out there, so the ads are a moot point. Pay or become the product.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Why does the video stop when you turn your phone screen off?
If the only answer is "so that people will pay money for it", you are garbage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Two big things I've noticed:

  1. They removed the Chromecast queue feature. So if I'm casting to my TV, I can either play one video at a time, or I can enable autoplay and see what the algorithm decides to serve me - I can't queue up a few videos and just watch those, like I used to be able to.

  2. Playlists are becoming harder and harder to use. Finding the button to add a video to a playlist, moving videos from one playlist to another, and managing playlists in general has all become more difficult recently.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its crazy Ads are starting to show up on premium. Just Cable 2.0.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

???

There's a lower cost ad plan for YouTube music is that what you mean?

I thought everyone wanted YouTube premium without the music. That's the ad plan: it shows ads on music because you're not paying for ad free music.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would they release a product for free that costs massive amounts to run

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

...into the ground

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really don't think it's the devs driving these decisions...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

On one hand, yes, on the other, the devs won't pitch ideas that go against the ad machine either. So ideas from devs are either neutral or pro-ad as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just because it is a free innovative video hosting platform .... it still doesn't mean it is useful or beneficial. Thousands and thousands of hours of just useless junk content of idiots showing to everyone in infinite detail how stupid they are .... and the worst part is, everyone loves it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is also a lot of educational content, including lectures, interviews, popular science channels, investigative journalism, and tutorials on anything from how to apply nail polish to how to fly an actual Boeing 737 from real airline pilots. This list is endless. Besides, there's nothing wrong with junk content either, sometimes we all need to unwind and watch something silly. Don't take YouTube for granted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Educational YouTube is the only reason I ever visit the site at this point.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

These platforms seem more vulnerable to alternatives than they ever have been before but it turns out the opposite is true. The hosting infrastructure is so expensive that it prevents competitors from even starting. Datacenters are basically a cartel and getting your foot in the door is near impossible without bouncing in on the heels of someone who's in. Making compute storage cheaper is not the name of the game when it's easier to profit by simply limiting access and driving the price up.

On the other hand, YouTube has never been profitable.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

"Why isn't one of the most expensive to operate websites free?!"

There's a reason there are zero actual competitors in this space (maybe TikTok but it's full of its own problems). Only a company as big as Google can afford to run at this scale. Feel free to add your business plan on how to make YouTube free without ads and without it shutting down in 3 months.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not a business plan because business=money, but how about creators host their own videos and share them through BitTorrent. No need to deliver real time video, users just download what they want to watch then watch them as they become available. Funding occurs through Kofi or Patreon etc. They'll need to publish the magnet links somewhere but that's a whole load cheaper than publishing RT video.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The vast majority of what YouTube does on a technical level is ingesting a ton of uploaded user video, encoding it in dozens of combinations of resolution, framerate, quality, and codec, then seamlessly choosing which version to serve to requesting clients to balance bandwidth, perceived quality, power efficiency in the data center, power efficiency on client devices, and hardware support for the client. There's a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes, and there's a reason why the user experience is much more seamless on YouTube on a shitty data connection than, say, Plex on a good data connection.

No, it doesn't need to be realtime, but people with metered or throttled bandwidth might benefit from downloading just in time video at optimized settings.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’ve been stewing on making an “unpopular opinion” post about how neckbeards ruined the internet by demanding everything be “free” (meaning ad-supported) and then using ad blockers (meaning the normies had to pick up the slack).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Ah yes
The failing newspaper strategy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I pay for services (including lemmy - support your instance leeches) and use an ad blocker for everything else.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I'm fine with having to pick between ads and paying for a service, but when there are ads when I paid not to see them...

I pay for YouTube premium and have for several years, but if I start seeing ads I'll go to watching Nebula and listening to podcasts and cut out YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well you say that, but I feel entitled to free shit. - Common take on lemmy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

This but unironically? One of the reasons there's no YouTube alternative is because it's not profitable, but the other is it's a monopoly. If YouTube failed tomorrow I'm sure a lot of free alternatives (Odyssey, Peertube instances, etc) would blow up

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Ads and subscription aside, any time there is a feature I like on YouTube, they remove it or change it. More often than not when they add a new feature, it makes the experience worse for me.

I understand they need to make money. I'm willing to sit through ads or pay a subscription for that. But the ads are constantly getting worse. Mid-roll ad breaks that are auto-generated into the video (for older videos, content creators would have to go through their library to manually change them, from what I understand). A push for censoring content to avoid demonetisation, even content not intended for children.

Yes, part of it is that I got used to YouTube in its early days when it was operating at a loss. When it was a wild west of content creation. But it just feels like it has become so unfriendly to users and content creators alike. It has become corporate and sterile, while trying to squeeze in revenue everywhere it can. (Likely to barely break even, sure, but they don't have to make it crap to use to do that.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, especially when you consider that if you're nostalgic for any time on YouTube prior to 2015 it wasn't profitable at the time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Google has destroyed their own ads revenue by adding more and more ads. Imagine they'd have stopped with simple side banner and people would've not even bothered to use an adblocker because of it. This tiny little banner would've been worth as much as the multiple seconds ads now. The companies would pay as much, as there'd be no alternate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Oh no, I didn't pay and have to watch an ad! Literally slaves.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

Option 1: lose money

Option 2: more money

Google: chooses option 2

Internet: surprisedpikachu.png

load more comments
view more: next ›