this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
58 points (95.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35800 readers
1379 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

first of all, i don't identify as latino, sorry!!! but anyway when i talk about mexico being treated the same way as canada, i mean,, for example when it comes to prices,, canada and usa have both of their dollars on the back of stuff, like if you bought a book in canada in the back it would say "10 usd/10 cad", but no mexican currency? isn't mexico also the neighbor and both nations have good ties?? it should be treated with the same level of important stuff

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Part of it is cultural while another part is economic.

Culturally, Canada was part of the British Empire well into the 20th century. This meant that having relations with Canada was having relations with the British Empire. Outside of the War of 1812, the British Empire typically negotiated with the USA with respect that the USA could project at least the same kind of land power in the Americas as the British Empire could.

Culturally, Mexico was a successor nation to the Spanish Empire. Mexico didn't have the level of protection that Canada did nor did it have similar government institutions as the USA had. There was also a difference in approach to colonization between the two nations; the USA engaged in settler colonialism using white Europeans while Mexico had a large indigenous population incorporated into Mexican society.

Economically, Canada has a per capita national wealth on par with the USA while Mexico has lagged behind. This has led to a lot of migration from Mexico to the USA and Mexico being used as a low cost labor source.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Because we dont usually buy books in english?

But there are several products with boxes written in both languages.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I often see goods where the box has one side printed in English and the other side in Spanish.

Books are a little different because of the shared* language.

*except Québec.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

From an outsiders perspective, from what I can tell it's just racism

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

This is loosely related so forgive me if it's not helpful.

The world has been broken up into economic zones for some markets. Using DVDs as my example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD_region_code

Mexico falls into region 4 while the USA and Canada fall into region 1.

This serves several purposes but I'll focus on one.

This allows the publishers to sell DVDs at different prices for different regions. This is to accommodate the different buying power of the average citizen of these regions, without competing with themselves at an international level.

I suspect why you don't see Mexico on the tag is a reflection of this concept. You're not selling the book at an equivalent value and advertising that might cause salty customers that want the less expensive price. Or citizens of that country demanding the alternative price while abroad, complicating things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"identify" as latino? americans are so insanely funny. I thiught latinos came from.latin america or were raised in the latin american culture.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

i'm not american i'm actually from mexico but for cultural reasons and other stuff i don't identify as latino!! but i understand some people do identify as such and that's ok,, but not me, so sorry

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

"Identify" can also be used objectively in that way.
OP means "My identity ≠ Latino"
More uncommon to use it that way nowadays but you could also say "I don't identify as an American citizen" or "I identify as 15 years old" etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Well, that's an accurate origin of latino.

But that doesn't mean someone is obligated to internalize being latino. That's extra true when a person is the child of immigrants. They can be raised within their parent's culture, and then take on varying degrees of identification with either that culture, or the surrounding one.

And there's nothing saying that someone in the Latin American country they're born in can't separate themselves, at least internally, from the culture of their country, or their region.

That's true of any culture. You can be from the us and take on any degree of identity as an american, or reject that entirely and build your own identity on any number of factors.

You never met anyone that's of latino origins that assimilated fully into the culture of a different country? It's pretty common. My best friend's husband is Nicaraguan, and identifies as that, Latino, and American. He's got siblings that were raised in Nicaragua before the family moved here that outright ignore that culture and don't even speak Spanish with anyone poster than their parents. He's got nieces and nephews that embrace being latino, but not necessarily Nicaraguan, and vice versa.

A sense of cultural identity is largely voluntary.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Mate, how is that funny?

In a multicultural environment, you don’t always identify with the culture you were born into.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's funny because OP leads with stating they don't identify as Latino, and then proceeds to ask a question that has absolutely nothing to do with identity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Because if they did consider themself Latino, it might sound more like a personal complaint instead of just a general question.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, nah, that was confusing as eh.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Absolutely.

Genetically I'm around 50% descended from people of a culture that I simply wasn't raised in, which is associated with a religion I never practiced (as opposed to the different religion I left)

Based on looks I could easily identify as that culture and strangers wouldn't question it. They also don't question my lack of doing so.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One part of this is history.

Canada and the US were British colonies; Mexico was a Spanish colony.

When some of the British colonies declared independence, they still had to trade with the colonies that hadn’t. People had relatives on both sides, the postal systems were integrated, indigenous people were mistreated in the same manner, and the list goes on. Culturally, the two remained very similar while the political systems differed.

Stuff coming from England often ended up in Toronto or New York; both of these cities became hubs of publication.

This is the way the relationship stayed pretty much up until NAFTA in the 1990s; books had already had over a century of being published in Toronto and New York for distribution across English North America.

Mexico had a different history, and a different relationship with California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. Instead of Mexico being a route for culture and European goods to enter the US, it was a source of cheap labor once slavery was abolished.

Unlike Canada where the most influential Canadians lived right along the border, in Mexico the influential Mexicans lived further south, with itinerant workers living along the border.

NAFTA changed the balance of trade somewhat, but it didn’t change the already established cultural norms or the places people lived.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Also English language books are going to be predominantly sold in English speaking countries. And it makes sense cost wise to target both markets together rather than printing individual runs priced for individual countries where possible.

And Canada and the US both use dollars; there is potential ambiguity in price for manufacturers and retailers, so better to clearly specify both. There is not ambiguity with the peso - if a customer sees a book is $10 they will know there is a different price in pesos.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think it's a question of language. If you're a publisher printing an English language book in Canada, you can expect to sell it to English readers in the US and Canada, so it is efficient to print the price for both on the same printing run. You would probably expect not to be selling books in English in countries where the primary language is not English. In other words, probably for the same reason that English language books don't have the price for Spain or China.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

oh you're actually right!! well that makes sense too, thanks

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

absolutely this, here in Austria most of our books are obviously written in German, so many of them have prices for Germany, Austria and sometimes Switzerland on them, but obviously not for other neighboring countries because the books for them are written in Italian, Slovak, etc.