Related Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Other Programming Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
corporations can create good applications and tooling, they also create toxic dark pattern applications
open source devs can create air tight software or they can make some dingus word alternatives that just doesn't work at all
I love open source but there are certainly some programs out there (for free though)
The profit motive is why they throw so much money at it. I like FOSS better too but these differences can't easily be separated.
I feel like people will give a pass to the shitty elements of Microsoft Office, etc. but then harp on the tiniest issues with open-source software.
Kind of reminds me of a recent election...
It's just like for Windows , but we're so used to the software that we've learned to work around.
When you switch, you are met with productivity loss and learning new quirks, which makes the experience less than stellar.
In today's context, for the vast majority of people, if it isn't easy to use, they won't use it because pretty much every app and software has become plug and play (except niche software that looks like windows 3.1)
It's probably because they know nobody's listening to their complaints about Microsoft.
It probably isn't.
Saying millions of dollars like that's a lot of money to spend developing an app. Meta has literally hundreds of devs just working on WhatsApp. You'll burn through around a million dollars in one year with about six devs when you factor in all the costs.
more like 3-4 devs
It's usually actually the other way around in my experience
Anything that has the label "pro" or "enterprise" suuuuuucks, is badly designed, full of bugs.. take the open source app, and it just works
There’s just so much more opportunity for feedback, use case stories, and a variety of perspectives in open source development.
Good enterprise development does all those things as well, but there is always a bigger barrier to the user when you have to design behind a curtain.
I'm pretty sure it's not lack of user feedback. It's MBAs deciding the user is wrong and unprofitable, therefore better add more tracking and ads.
Exactly. These companies have more feedback than they could ever parse. They only listen if said feedback results in loss of profit.
Which proprietary app is better than the open source version?
MasterCAM blows absolutely every open-source solution out of the water. It isn't even a competition. In this case, it is actually cheaper to buy their really expensive and restrictive license, because in the end you save a near immeasurable amount of time in modeling, drafting, programming, and production. The fee CAD programs that can even support a postprocessing operation (becoming closer to a real CAM solution) are really bad at it and the toolpaths are far from ideal.
That sounds really specific.
It is, but MasterCAM is also the primary workhorse for a large global industry, so I wouldn't say that it is insignificant by any means.
I used Joplin everyday for half a year but switched to Obsidian after that. They both essentially do the same, but I found the latter to be more adaptable to my needs and paradoxically easier to modify.
Don't get me wrong, the open source one in still great. Served me well while I was using it.
CAD
Agreed, I run Brics CAD on my linux box.
I only chose Brics CAD over AutoCAD/Draftsight because they have a NATIVE linux version. This is for 2D CAD work only.
I haven't had a need for the 3D stuff yet.
Yeah okay. Damn.
MS office is arguably the best office suite in terms of features. The overall user experience is awful though.
I'm terms of features? Their features are useless because they can't play nice with others, which is the point of a document.
Adobe may be a shit company but Photoshop's user interface is far better than GIMP
Photoshop has a nice looking UI but there are some very subtle but really useful things GIMP does that Photoshop doesn't. For example when drawing with the Rectangle/Ellipse tool GIMP doesn't immediately lock in the selection but gives me handles I can use to perfectly fine tune the selection down to the pixel, especially for the ellipse tool. I don't get that level of control over the marquee tool in Photoshop.
I can also freely scroll and zoom while using the lasso tool in GIMP and it can go between free draw lasso and poly draw lasso by clicking and dragging or just clicking to establish new lasso nodes. And I can just undo any of those nodes by hitting backspace.
The only tool I really miss in GIMP is the magnetic lasso but needing to drag the cursor all the way to the edge of the screen just to scroll somewhere else on an image makes the tool so much worse.
I don't think that's nearly enough to make it better.
If I had to use GIMP again I'd just kill myself.
Then again, I sure wouldn't pay for photoshop, either.
While we're making unpopular statements about free software: Audacity is the GIMP of the audio-editing world. REAPER is where it's at.
K