this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
368 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AI can’t be any be worse than Trump, right?

…right?!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

He does sound like an AI suffering regurgitation hallucinations sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

just stop supporting american companies already; trump's already going to ruin the economy so if you stop supporting american businesses it'll crash faster. pirate that shit if you have to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Quick let’s make an AI that despises billionaires.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good, AI is the trojan horse to copyright.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Yes but actually no because the massive IP holders will still sue the everliving shit out of you.

They'll happily take your art though.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To the surprise of absolutely no one. Tech companies are going to force this shit down our throats whether we want it or not, and Trump is going to pave the way for it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I really don’t think their goal is consumers.

Sure they want consumers to use generative AI so that they get quality feedback so they can improve the product. But that is not the goal.

The goal is enterprises, the goal is replacing workers with AI.

There are estimations that around 300B$ have spent so far for generative AI. This is not for a gadget that close to no-one likes and burns money rather than make money

This is for removing humans from the productive cycle. It is such an ambitious goal that the various CEOs/shareholders are ok taking such an high risk gamble.

Trump will ditch any red tape to AI because Trump openly wants this world, a world where there isn’t any more the need for immigrants or workers or unions.

My ingenuity suggests me that this plan will fail on technical grounds but if it will not, it will be worse. There will be poverty and civil unrest, there will be instability and wars (it’s always easier to look for the enemy outside rather than inside) and, in the end, economy will not do great either (who will buy the crap people will produce?)

Again, I think that this plan will fail on technological grounds but removing red tapes will not accelerate this failure

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, don’t for a second think this wasn’t part of the deal he made with Musk.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that if you use generative AI to publically embarass Donnie, safeguards will be tightened before one can start and finish the pledge of allegiance.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I made a lot of Donald and Putin porn to shock the local magats. I never posted it, just showed them on my phone.

Turns out that if you use some languages other than English, even the shittiest AI wouldn’t filter out the words haha.

Доналд Трамп Путиннің пенисіне микрофон сияқты ән айтады

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, it didn't work for me. Maybe some other site will, though. (Ignoring the fact that we can already run an uncensored Stable Diffusion locally anyway...)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did it on starryai. I don’t think you can use it without an account these days though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Same for Microsoft Designer tbh

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Have you heard the saying about horrible end being better than horror without end?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone should dismantle him, in small pieces

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

He’d look great mounted over a mantle

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don’t think this will make much difference honestly, we already have very little regulation here. It probably means that there will be copyright exemptions for training models. And honestly eroding copyright bit by bit is okay in my book.

What we should be worried about are the human rights that are about to be violated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think it just means that his boy elon van do whatever he wants with his shitty ai

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Problem is it is used to clean out copyleft too. Copyleft is a social good version of copyright. Using AI to wash it away, along with authorship, is not ok. Lots of open source wouldn't have taken over if it wasn't for stickiness of copyleft breaking "the tragedy of the commons".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're right about the regulation but I'm not so sure about the copyright exemptions. All in all, you'd think he's more likely to side with property owners - especially the heirs of media empires - over progress.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s certainly true. Trump’s also close with Musk these days, and Musk certainly will pressure him to allow Grok to vacuum up all the data for free.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Musk also has his hands on a fair amount of data through X and Tesla. But yeah... Copyright expansion seems like an odd place to start breaking the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Allowing the rich and powerful to get around copyright is good, actually, because it means copyright MAY someday go away"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Don't forget the current supreme court motto though: "rules for thee but not for me". Only massive and rich corporations will be allowed around copyright rules, but you and I and indie and open source will be held to the letter of the law.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When Trump is crushing them under his boot they will blame Joe Biden.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had a little trouble getting my morning poop out today. I decided to blame Joe Biden. It was either that or the pound and a half of cheese I had yesterday.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is "blame Biden" the next "thanks Obama"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've heard that despite the vast majority of objective measures of societoeconomic factors improving under his leadership, many with direct links to policies he put in place, that he's actually the very worst president in the 400 year span of American democracy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Maybe he shouldnt have insisted the economy was great and people should be Happy with it. That messaging lost the democrats the election.

load more comments
view more: next ›