this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Tree Huggers

598 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New research shows that, instead of replanting rainforests, allowing them to bounce back naturally would store loads of carbon and water.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Or you know, give the land back to indigenous peoples.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Judging from the article and abstract (not the study itself), I think it shows that natural reforestation is clearly better than humans doing arbitrary ad hoc reforestation. It does not seem to suggest that natural reforestation would outperform well designed strategically engineered reforestation.

But it’s interesting nonetheless to be able to conclude that reforestation that is not well thought out is worse than doing nothing. It also means that the greenwashing practice of just planting arbitrary trees to take credit for carbon offsetting is even worse than previously thought.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We will never be able to do something better than mother nature.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, natural immunity is much better than antibiotics and vaccines, which is why we invented them in the first... Oh no wait, that's actually incredibly wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm talking about ecosystems here but thanks for assuming I'm antivaxxer. Disease and sickness is also part of mother nature's ecosystem controls, we've just kinds learned to beat that part.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

My point was simply that there are a lot of things we do "better than nature", though we are a part of nature anyways so the distinction is arbitrary.