this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
129 points (93.3% liked)

memes

10032 readers
2891 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

better version of: https://lemmy.world/post/21210097

<3

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 minutes ago

Not sure that its a must have and possibly uBO could handle it if I could be bothered to check but I like LocalCDN too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

the return dislike plugin is just stupid. it's a community database now, so rather than being based on the actual number of dislikes on youtube it's based on the dislikes of the people who have the plugin.

it used to be that it actually got the real numbers but youtube removed that endpoint so now it's just a misanthropic echo chamber.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

It's better than nothing. Also I'd probably weigh the opinion of people who have the extension higher than of those who don't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 minutes ago

Is it? personally, when i think of "people who want to see the dislike bar" my mind equates that to "people who want to dislike", and that's not a group of people i want to interact with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago) (1 children)

It's honestly relatively representative afaik

Even though it, SponsorBlock etc. could just be neglected by using piped or just federated alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago) (1 children)

how can we even know that though? there's no stats anymore.

also, if peertube et al got bigger, surely sponsorblock would be useful there as well? if creators would use those services because people were on them, sponsors would contact those creators because they got the views.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

It subjectively feels right, and instances where creators leaked the numbers the RTYTD stats matched pretty closely.

Until peertube grows to that size, it's still a long time. Then it would be useful.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago

Need to add a pihole to that stack

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Just installed Consent-o-matic and Unpaywalled. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty soon, Firefox will need to be replaced with Waterfox and LibreWolf, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

People at the top of Mozilla Org making crappy decisions.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 hours ago

Consent-o-matic instead of cookies and adnausem instead of ublock origin.

Consent-o-matic will actively opt out of popups.

Adnausem is built on top of ublock origin and will silently "click" on the ads behind the scenes to mess up your advertising profile and cost the advertisers money.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 hours ago

No, use uBlock Origin.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 hours ago

Isn't Ghostery made by an ads company?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

What's wrong with privacy badger?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Privacy Badger has historically allowed tracking until it successfully identifies a domain as a likely tracker. Like the air bags going off after you've already wrapped your car around a telephone pole. But it's now been changed and is now closer to a list-based tracker blocker (enumerate badness):

Privacy Badger no longer learns from your browsing by default, as “local learning” may make you more identifiable to websites.

They've since corrected one of the core issues with PB by doing so, but it still it is very weak. To see why, please glance through The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security.

uBlock Origin in advanced mode, with default-deny rules (only allow assets by exception) is going to be much stronger at blocking crap.

Personally, I use uMatrix with pretty much all asset classes blocked by default. I never see popups. I never see banners begging "please allow our cookies, pleeeeaaase!".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago

Well, it can be replaced with uBlock Origin and some people dont recomend it anymore

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think UBO makes it redundant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

The layered security model has redundancy built in as a feature.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not OP, but what puts me off is that it calls itself badger, but really it's just a software that has nothing in common with those glorious animals. Did you know that badgers' keen sense of smell is about 800 times sharper than our own?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 hours ago

!subscribe to badger facts