Maybe just say "Hey, X isn't running this game. I am". If you're open to their participation, you could add "But if you'd like to join us, would you mind introducing yourself?". If you don't want them to join, you could say "Sorry, but I already have enough players for this campaign"
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
rpg
3152 readers
9 users here now
This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs
Rules (wip):
- Do not distribute pirate content
- Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
- Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
- Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
- Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
- Do not advertise for livestreams
- Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
- Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
- No Zak S content.
- Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thanks!
I’d also consider if this person has admin privileges to the room, so you can have a backup way to contact the group if you’re kicked.
I think you're reading way too much into this. Just talk to the guy.
I'll do just that. Thanks.
Just off the top of my head, I'm thinking:
- They're probably expecting the GM and/or other players to respond with either "sorry, that schedule won't work for us" or "yeah, that works for us, tell us about yourself." Like, why type up a three-paragraph introduction when there's like a 50% (or more) chance that bit of information will quickly indicate that no, it won't work out.
- Are you sure they didn't just assume the chatroom owner was the GM?
- So far I think they're just trying to gauge whether it's going to work out logistically.
- Again, are you sure they haven't just mistaken the channel owner for the person is most responsible for organizing?
I guess just going on that information, it does feel to me like maybe you're reading too much into it. It's entirely possible I'm missing something that would change my take, though.
I appreciate your detailed answer.