this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
355 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58975 readers
3700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Parity rebuild will only take a week....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

A week before next month

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

this is great news! I'm running low on space on my 20tb now.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My 6TB drive just died. So I'm in the market for a new one.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

sorry but these aren't 6TB

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mebbe the 26 one is just 3-4 smaller drives inside it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You joke but that's sorta how it works for some HDDs lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I hope you think of having several platters, not real drives :-D

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Obligatory hint that SMR isn't suited for RAID systems.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Tape on a platter, basically.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wonder what happens if you throw them in an unraid BTRFS/jbod configuration with a CMR parity drive.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Slowdown and data corruption?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A better way to word it is: SMR is only suited for archival usage. Large writes, little-to-no random writes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder how the read performance would be.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you know the format of SMR, then you can trivially see the read performance is not impacted. Writing is impacted, because it has to write multiple times for each sector write (because of overlapping sectors that allow the extra density).

Impacted write performance, coupled with hdds are generally slow with random writes PLUS the extra potential for data loss due to less-atomic sector writes, makes them terrible drives for everything except archival usage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Think of the parity!

load more comments
view more: next ›