this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
614 points (92.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20993 readers
1721 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    I have a Linux Mint running on a intel atom CPU with 256mb ram and no graphics card and it kinda works.

    (page 2) 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    i love how the ram is connected to the potato, standing straight :) pardon my english

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

    Recent news about running Linux on intel 4004 be like

    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    I think macOS and windows have to swapped 🤔 macyoS seems to run less bloat in background

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

    Yeah ddinitely needs image swap, or this meme would make more semse if it said $ instead of requirements. MacOS is unixy and doesn't require super specs

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    😁macOS is even more Unix than linux (BSD kernel)

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)
    [–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

    [Children of the Omnissiah plays]

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I looked into running potatoless ages ago and didn't care for the tradeoffs that come with running hamster wheel. You have to change the potatoes every so often, but at least they don't shit everywhere.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

    (Oh, I assumed pictured was a potato CPU, not potato PSU)

    Anyways, as long as you don't make the mistake of using runny ((s)mashed) potatoes, it should be fairly ez.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Have you ever tried Linux on photosynthesis?

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

    That sounds like it runs Mint, or genetically modified SUSE.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Missed opportunity to make trashcan joke about macos.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

    Trashcan Mac is good tho, as compact and quiet Linux machine it is

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

    They’re almost down to a price where I’d consider picking one up just because I think they look awesome, and are reasonably easy to max out their spec. Trouble is, that maxed out spec might tip its benchmarks over my M2 Macbook. Might.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

    Xeon 2696v3 is good with it's 18 core 36 threads, this cpu cost around 45$ on AliExpress too, also top up 128gb ram and it'll be great homeserver

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

    Out of interest, I just looked up the actual benchmark scores.

    A ‘13 Pro with a Xeon 2697v2 scores 4891 on multi core

    My 15” M2 MacBook Air scores 9735 on the same.

    It’s astonishing how much Apple leapt ahead when the M-series chips dropped. Sure, the Intel machines on macOS still have their uses, (I’m typing this on a 2014 Mac mini that I use for work), but Apple have done an incredible job of flooding the market with solid hardware to install Linux on.

    [–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    This is a triumph. I'm making a note here, "HUGE SUCCESS".

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

    Its hard to overstate my satisfaction

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

    How are you holding up?

    Because I am a potato

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    It's hard to over-state my satisfaction

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Aperture Science, we do what we must because we can.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

    For the good of all of us; except the ones who are dead :(

    [–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    You need to show a better computer for windows

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Its literally a surface product (yes they suck)

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Oh lol I thought it was a netbook

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

    Nah its a surface book

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    I really liked my surface tablet tbh

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

    No idea what you're talking about tbh, everyone I talked to that owned one has been pretty happy with it.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 103 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Apple's requirements should be a pile of money, a big pile of money.

    [–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    A pile of money on fire

    And then Apple refusing to repair it due to "water damage"

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: ‹ prev next ›