watch the reason be epic and/or gog not wanting their stores to be thought of as 'junk'
Steam Deck
A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.
Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.
As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title
The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.
Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.
These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.
Rules:
- Follow the rules of Sopuli
- Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
- No piracy, there are other communities for that.
- Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
- This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
- Have fun.
Heroic Launcher works fine for me. What those others launchers do?
a launcher that has a primary purpose of launching other games from other stores might have been a bridge too far.
Really? Because steam has been selling games from companies who do this for years with the only backlash coming from upset customers that the corporations usually ignore anyways.
That's still for games sold through Steam. Most importantly, that's for games that the companies agreed to sell through Steam.
If I was Valve, my biggest concern here would be that officially selling a tool for sideloading Epic games could be seen as approving of breaking Epic's ToS. Epic is also very sue happy when it comes to attacking rival companies.
What are you referring to? Because in this case Steam would be getting a certain amount once for you to be able to playing hundreds or thousands of games on another platform
The many games you buy on Steam that then launch another god damn launcher from another company when you launch them.
I hate it, but Steam never seemed to mind.
Bought a game recently on steam, and it wanted to launch Ubisoft connect after installing - fastest refund I ever requested.
Paid product? I'm not sad, we already have Heroic Games Launcher for free, and it works just fine.
I didn't agree with it being a paid product either. And I might have been misunderstanding so don't take my word on this, but I think it was originally open source and free (at least in money, not sure about freedom) for those running Bazzite Linux and that they planned to keep supporting that version, so I feel like all that would do for the Steam Deck is incentivize people to install Bazzite Linux on it so that it would work.
It's available as a open source Decky plugin, but the steam version was going to be a paid closed source rewrite.
I've installed it on a Chimera machine also via Decky so I don't think it's distro specific.
Oh yeah, I didn't mean to make it sound like it was distro-speciffic, I just think that Bazzite was the primary platform target originally (but I might be wrong)
It said it was free to download and use but a convenience charge for getting it on Steam.
But like you, I'm also happy with Heroic, and there's also Lutris.
There are a few foss programs and games that do that and it does make sense since it costs money to put things on steam.