Wait is this loss
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
371 points (86.0% liked)
Memes
45656 readers
2005 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
~~:.|:;~~
Nobody: "We need a 'nobody:' in there!
Im pretty sure some people said that
If not, are all the memes with "nobody: " in them werent made by anybody and that is the signature?
I was being hyperbolic. The original usage is completely incorrect, because if nobody said nothing, then everybody said something.
I genuinely can't fucking stand this. It never breaks away cleanly and it just makes it annoying to share because the pieces are all different sizes
Is Lemmy now that popular that people start posting disguised ads?
I don't think there are that many ads, even if there were you could easily get rid of them by buying my cool Lemmy adblock that uses AI to recognize clever product placement and cover it up with a picture of dirt!
really? we can't allude to anything now? oh no someone referenced a movie, they must be working for the studio!
I'd really appreciate it if we kept Lemmy without the miserable grumpy cat that is r/hailcorporate just running around accusing people of shilling for literally mentioning anything in any context whatsoever.
Name checks out
Is this a loss meme?
Chocolate company’s.
Nobody does nothing?
"companys?"
Get this shit outta here
Man, I've never understood this nobody meme and it seems nobody is even able to explain it.
We're on the same boat. The meme is very ambiguous, but it roughly means that something happens seemingly without a reason, i.e. the author doesn't understand why something is the way it is
You just need a basement full of Oompa Loompas, then you don't need predetermined breaking points on your chocolate and could enjoy it entirely.
Companies
Haven't seen that before but, I am okay with this.
Make it a Nautilus spiral or fractals and I could theoretically have endless chocolate.
view more: next ›