this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
1013 points (99.0% liked)

Greentext

4604 readers
338 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Weird, but hey they ain't hurting nobody, so meh

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are there actually Amish people in India?

I can't tell if this is real or not.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

American Indians, the term hasn't died out in the New World quite yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Old worlder here. Still calling them Indians. Also actively refusing to use the term towards people of India, bexause we have other words for them (actually two, one similiar to Indian, secons not at all, neither a slur).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Honestly I won't bother correcting 'indian' but I prefer other terms

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

In Russian language the difference between American and actual Indians is one letter in spelling (easily heard in pronunciation, so only small children maybe mix them up), historically it's a variation of the same word.

For "turkey" the bird the feminine version of the former is used (and not used to refer to an American Indian woman).

The point is, it's the main word to refer to Native Americans. "Настоящему индейцу завсегда везде ништяк" and all that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Many people refer to the people who were living in North America before Europeans as “Indians” and there’s even a good portion of those people that use it to self identify as well, even if “Native American” is more widely used, if not also somewhat an inaccurate if you’re getting technical.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely fair enough, I'm just a somewhat ignorant Welsh man!

They have only ever been described here as American/Native American.

Though now that you mention this, Cowboys & Indians suddenly makes a lot more sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Christopher Columbus, who discovered Americas, thought he was heading to India.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

This is local politics in action. In a federation this is protected. In a federation this could also be forced on all federated states or banned. In a federal system it is also allowed that damaging actions are outlawed or embraced and cherished by the state. It is all imperfect but the entire idea is the hope that all the various levels of legal authority check and balance themselves for the benefit of the people and are accountable to wrote law.

I am just writing this for people to maybe remember that this is how a federation (see: The United States of America) is fundamentally supposed to function.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's not weird, that's how things should be. Working together.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

agreed. technically, both are native.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well no, the Amish were settlers too. They're just working with the Indians instead of in spite of the Indians.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they were all born there. we need to stop considering ancestors and consider the living.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We can stop when we actually give them the same opportunities and protections white people get. You don't get to oppress a population for 500 years and then just act like nothing happened.

load more comments
view more: next ›