this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
791 points (97.8% liked)

RPGMemes

10228 readers
348 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
791
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they'd have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

(page 4) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 137 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ain't nothin' in the RAW that states a sentient pile of dust can't play basketball.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I see no flaw in this argument. Instead of dying, the character exists like the guy from “One” by Metallica, desperately waiting for a stiff breeze to end his existence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean, from your characters perspective, death is preferable to being transmuted to dust, especially in a setting with a well established afterlife.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey, you don't know my character. He's making the best of his fine dusty life.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 139 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

OP you appear to be committed to (not) dying on this hill and I applaud you

[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I like it RAW and wriggling!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

A disintegrated creature and everything it is wearing and carrying, except magic items, are reduced to a pile of fine gray dust. The creature can be restored to life only by means of a true resurrection or a wish spell.

Why would you need to be "restored to life" if you weren't dead?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The difficulty of restoring to life someone who is already alive is why such high-level magic is required.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 91 points 3 weeks ago (31 children)

Because you could later die. So a creature that has been disintegrated, and then later dies, can only be brought back by those means.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You're misreading the language. It is present-tense, not future.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not misreading anything. "The creature can only..." applies a new state to the creature. After that state has been applied, or somehow reversed (unaware of any way to do this by RAW), then the creature can only be brought back to life by the means mentioned in the spell.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Yes you are. You're intentionally abusing a weakness in English language (present and future tense are often written the same way so must be inferred by context) to assume something clearly not intended by the 2 sentences considered holistically.

It's a funny joke. +1, but, ain't no DM takin dis Hail Mary from a player seriously. 😂

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Wanna bet?

I'd make it an absolute realistic pile of dust, unable to move, unable to cast magic, fight, or anything but be carried along by whatever picked it up, and when enough of the dust gets separated, death is automatic.

But I'd still allow it as an interesting edge case once.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Just playing the game RAW.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's like this for all TTRPGs. Someone always be tryin to game the system. 😎

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's like this for all TTRPGs. Someone always be trying to rules lawyer away someone's fun. 😎

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, I don't know enough about the English language to recognise the difference. What would the phrase be in future tense?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

No. He's trolling you. No Reasonable person thinks this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

If the creature dies it can be restored to life only by means of...

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›