this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1381 readers
31 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week's thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Found a good one in the wild

@[email protected]

Didn't you know LLM stood for Limited Liability Machine

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

True believers at Vox' Future Perfect "vertical" let out a hearfelt REEEEEE as Saltman makes the obvious move to secure all the profits

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/374275/openai-just-sold-you-out

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

shocked that scorpions in a scorpion's nest funded by their scorpion mates might have fallen into stinging

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

oh hey its that reoccurring thought I have about the "AI Safety" criti-hype popping back into my head

Expanding on that, part of me feels Altman is gonna find all the rhetoric he made about "AI doom" being used against him in the future - man's given the true believers reason to believe he'd commit omnicide-via-spicy-autocomplete for a quick buck.

Hell, the true believers who made this pretty explicitly pointed out Altman's made arguing for regulation a lot easier:

ai safety irony

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I'm feeling a weird mix of emotions about this. It's not the cash grab by ol' salty dog; capitalism is doing its thing. I'm both elated that these idiot liberals feel betrayed by this turn of events and enraged that these liberal idiots exist to launder the reputation of techbros in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

After years of sweet-talking the press, the public, and the policymakers in Congress, assuring all that OpenAI wants regulation and cares more about safety than about money, Altman is not even bothering to play games anymore. He’s showing everyone his true colors. Governor Newsom, are you seeing this? Congress, are you seeing this? World, are you seeing this?

this is so fucking funny. bro nobody but you is surprised

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

capitalist: does capitalism

liberal: Ah fuck, I can't believe you've done this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You think capitalists would do that? Go in front of the government and tell lies?

E: this is also my feeling about Altman saying 'I did drugs and I changed bro'.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I changed*

*I decided to get a blood boy!!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

a most shockedpikachu article, I love it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

But the move has some observers ­— including Musk himself — asking: How could this possibly be legal?

Because the nonprofit is there to represent the public, this would effectively mean shifting billions away from people like you and me. As some are noting, it feels a lot like theft.

it continues to be astounding how gullible some people can be (/choose to stay?)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not a sneer, but ~~Kendrick~~ Ed Zitron just dropped.

Its damn good as usual, with Zitron taking aim at the current state of SaaS and tying it into his previous sneers on AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

a nsfw found in the wild

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sam Altman says taking psychedelics ‘significantly changed’ his mindset

Altman being a druggie would go some way to explaining his utter disconnect from reality and utter lack of moral fibre

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ya know that inane SITUATIONAL AWARENESS paper that the ex-OpenAI guy posted, which is basically a window into what the most fully committed OpenAI doom cultists actually believe?

yeah, Ivanka Trump just tweeted it

But right now, there are perhaps a few hundred people, most of them in San Francisco and the AI labs, that have situational awareness. Through whatever peculiar forces of fate, I have found myself amongst them.

oh boy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

barron: shows ivanka the minecraft speedrun

ivanka: I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT, BROTHER

edit: accidentally read ivanka as melania, now corrected

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally, I was radicalized by 'watch for rolling rocks' in .5 A presses

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

parallel universes were the inspiration behind urbit, it all makes sense

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

From that blog post:

You can see the future first in San Francisco.

"And that, I think, was the handle - that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of old and evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn't need that. Our energy would simply prevail. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look west, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not a sneer, but a pretty solid piece on the slop-nami: Drowning in Slop, by Max Read

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Twitter — Elon Musk’s X — may be the most fruitful platform for this kind of search thanks to its sub-competent moderation services.

Zing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Do you think when the Trumps get paperclipped it will look something like this?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

This was the woman who took over during Sam Altman's temporary removal as CEO, which we're pretty sure happened because the AI doom cultists weren't satisfied that Altman was enough of an AI doom cultist.

Yudkowsky was solidly in favor of her ascension. I take no joy in saying this as someone who wants this AI nonsense to stop soon, but OpenAI is probably better off financially with fewer AI doom cultists in high positions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you think they still say all that bullshit even when they're not screenshooting it for twitter? Probably, right

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I might not be a huge fan of his work, but I'll take it any day over AI slop. At least it's a creative vision.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

You don't have to agree with someone to recognize that they care.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Turns out trump really does understand cryptocurrency perfectly. Who’d have thought? Some folk seems surprisingly unhappy about this, though.

Maybe we’ll pay off the $35 trillion US debt in Crypto. I’ll write on a little piece of paper ‘$35T crypto we have no debt.’ That’s what I like.

https://xcancel.com/mattyglesias/status/1838331688931266694

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I mean there are definitely some brain rotted crypto bros who would buy shares at face value because it's totally gonna go to the moon guys

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The question (which doesn't matter) now is, does he really understand crypto? Or did he get at the right conclusion because he thinks that everybody else, like him, is just scamming all the time?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Given the kinds of crowds he hangs out with (i.e. mostly other rich people and political elite) is that not an understandable conclusion?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

anything that makes yglesias have a bad day is generally a good thing

but it sounds like the orange man understands the crypto market perfectly: the numbers are all made up and everyone's lying

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

(at least I think it's that one? one of them's quite the bootlicker. I'm bad at names tho)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am sure this is totally not sketchy in the slightest and the people behind it have no nefarious agenda whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Ah yes the advertisement which causes T&S people (who have seen some things) to go on long rants on why you should never put pictures of your kids online publically.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

fuck that's gross

where'd you find/run across that? can't tell if it's a normal ad or some gig-site thing or what

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Saw it posted on Reddit. It's apparently from clickworker.com which is a weird-ass website by itself at first glance, with great pitches like this:

People are happier if they are more financially independent. We can help you achieve this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

ah, doman name sounds like it’s one of the microwork farms

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›