this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
201 points (89.4% liked)

World News

32318 readers
822 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My favorite genre of journalism: other countries' journalists writing about the US the same way the US writes about their countries. I'm just sad they didn't dredge up some "America expert" who's never been to the US and doesn't speak English to call for mass balkanization of the country followed by conspiracy theory screeds for the extra flavor.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

President Xi, the people of Occupied Cascadia yearn for freedom, please send Chengdu J-20 stealth fighters.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reads like the author moonlights for the Onion.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

these days old onion articles are prophecy and new onion articles cant even give me a raised eyebrow.

this is/does both.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 months ago (5 children)

However, it got off to a less than stellar start. The three moderate candidates in the race – Jill Stein, Cornel West and Chase Oliver – were barred from participating.

Instead, the contest pitted the two frontrunners: former President Donald Trump, the candidate of the far-white Republican Party, widely thought to be the political wing of white-Christianist militias, and Kamala Harris, the current vice president, who led a palace coup two months ago that forced the ageing, unpopular incumbent, President Joe Biden, to abandon his quest for re-election.

When did Aljazeera get this 🔥

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

the session at times degenerated into name-calling, fearmongering and outright lying. The two candidates traded insults, incited anti-China sentiment, differed over women’s rights and whether the country is facing an invasion by hordes of violent, pet-eating criminal immigrants, and agreed on backing the genocidal regime in Israel. There was little articulation by either candidate of a coherent vision for the country.

That's exactly how the world saw this, spot on mate 😂 I think they need to look up the definition of "debate"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (24 children)

The debate is literally an agreement between Donald trump and kamala Harris. There is no neutral debate commission involved. This doesn't really make sense.

Those candidates are free to have their own debate if they think they can convince someone to put them on TV.

Edit: Also is Jill Stein a "moderate"?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the point he's trying to make here is about the undemocratic nature of the election system, in which only the two frontrunners have a chance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Point of order, Kamala didn't "lead" anything, she was chosen by party insiders of the clinton wing to take over.

Also Aljazeera has always been highly critical of the US, I started reading them fairly regularly in the mid 2000's as they were one of the only outlets criticizing Bush. (I don't think the intercept existed yet.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago

I gotta say, this article makes me feel sane again.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›