Is Musk even involved in day to day spacex operations? If he isn't, what does this have to do with him? Combined with the other comment about how this is statistically average, I'm getting some clickbaity vibes here
Space
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
I've commented on this previously, but this is essentially either a hit piece, or very poor reporting on Reuters' part.
Basically nobody looks at raw numbers for injury statistics. It's normalised to injures per million man hours worked, and when you take some conservative estimates on the size of SpaceX's workforce and the time periods involved, you find that they land pretty much in the middle of current "heavy industry" injury rates.
But it surrrre does look bad if you look at the raw numbers, just like if you looked at the combined raw numbers of, say, 10 steel mills across the country.
Permalink to my previous, much longer, comment
mining industry / [LTIFR of] 5.5 is middle of the road for manufacturing and construction, generally, but that includes all sorts of manufacturing, from building houses, to steel foundries , to making cars
They work in clean rooms and should have far more controlled conditions and a better safety culture than those industries. This is not good enough.
Also "middle of the road" is concerning, considering that this stuff is going up into space.
Thanks for contextualizing it.
I'll upvote you if you add one or more citations for your claims.
Or you could read the comment he linked where he explains his reasoning and logic in detail.
He makes claims that need citations.
If the result of getting the world's richest manbaby to space is a small cost of a bunch of dead and permanently injured people, that's a cost ol' Musky is willing to take.
He made the ultimate sacrifice of employees' lives so he can get to space and then shitpost about how it was him who did it, then call his naysayers pedophiles.
Apartheid Lonnie's "efficiency" in action. I wouldn't trust this man to wipe his own ass, let alone with a cabinet position.
Can we revoke his government contracts now?
I think I heard "Nationalize SpaceX" just now, and I have no complaints. Self funded NASA might get things done.
SpaceX can't survive without govt grants upwards of 8 billion USD ? per year?
So thats coming out of NASA.... which means not self-sufficient ...
- You're postulating that nearly 100% of their 2023 revenue was government grants, which is false.
https://payloadspace.com/estimating-spacexs-2023-revenue/
- I said a nationalized space x would BE a self sufficient NASA, because space X gets paid to provide services. Though I suppose a government run space delivery company might be more USSPS than NASA
8 BEEELLION USD per YEAR for a Private Business Owner ... PLEASE SIGN ME UP ! :-D
Are you seriously thinking that SpaceX can generate 8 BILLION USD revenue ????
StarLink probably brings in about 30 to 50 USD million per year .... thats not taking into account the cost of StarLink satellite launches .... so that is probably break-even or a small loss-leader. ( there are maybe about 80 million StarLink customers ? paying 50 USD per month ... )
Please give me even 1 MILLION USD ! :-D Let alone 8 ! EIGHT ! VIII !!! BEEELLLION DOLLARS !!!!!
Well, they're a private company so it's not reported. 8 Billion seems to be the consensus on guesses though. I believe the estimates put starlink revenue at roughly 3 billion.
3 billion from StarLink is not even remotely believable. StarLink does not have a customer base of 100+ million yet.
The US military (and other militaries) are also customers. They pay substantially more per month.