this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
325 points (87.7% liked)

science

15000 readers
728 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I had always assumed that Hunter-Gatherer societies were very loosely sex divided and strongly necessity based. Meaning, sure men could be the typical hunter and women the typical gatherer but if necessity dictates, any person would do any job, and, given the times, that was probably frequently.

Furthermore they also likely didn't have societal structures the way modern societies did, meaning people likely weren't barred from any job or forced into any job, it was a community effort for survival, if you meet a criteria that can help, you do that.

These are not factual statements, these are just my assumptions on how I figured they reasonably existed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Same here: the t seems the most logical answer. I’m not especially convinced by the arguments in this article, except that they are at least as strong as “man the hunter” arguments so neither changes my mind

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Ah, the sound of Joe Rogan's head exploding.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›