But but... Sanctions aren't working ?
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
8202 readers
43 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Something something war time economy too
wealht
Lemmy, unlike Reddit, does let an OP edit a post to correct typos in titles.
I dunno about mbin and other implementations.
done thanks
Thank you!
They also held 293.189 tonnes of unallocated gold, compared with 298.84 tonnes on August 1, 303.579 tonnes on July 1 and 329.795 tonnes on June 1.
So they sold almost 40 tonnes of gold in 4 months? I approve that trend.
Who's buying? Cause they are getting a hell of a deal.
Gold is very near its all-time high. It just set a new all-time high about a week ago
Gold is very near its all-time high. It just set a new all-time high about a week ago
But for russia to sell to someone else that requires trade with a heavily sanctioned country. That's a quick way to get on the "naughty list" and have sanctions applied to yourself too.
Gold is nothing if not something that can be easily and efficiently smuggled. The gold can be simply re-cast into generic gold bars or minted into back-dated Russian bullion coins. Just one passenger car can smuggle millions of dollars of gold across the border while attracting little scrutiny. From then, it can simply be easily sold to bullion dealers. Then the cash can be ferried back across the border or deposited in accounts at Kremlin-friendly banks.
If you have a network of agents doing this, you could probably offload thousands of ounces worth millions of dollars a month.
There's also the simple option of sending it all to a shady Chinese commodities exchange.
I mean, that depends.
In nominal, dollar terms, yes.
https://www.macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart
But I'm not sure how meaningful that is. Like, is there real-world significance to having a high unit price in dollars?
Gold hit $2,741.03/oz in January 1980.
And it's at $2,503.38/oz in August 2024.
Those numbers are close in nominal terms.
But to equal that 1980 peak, which was in 1980 dollars, in real terms in 2024 dollars, gold would need to be at...
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
About $10,463.15/oz in 2024. And it's a pretty long way from that today.
In January 1934, it hit $834.02/oz.
To match that in real terms in 2024, it'd need to be at about $17,258.73/oz.
I don't want to embarrass you, but uncheck the "inflation-adjusted" box in your first graph and recalculate.
Ooops!
It's good that they can just print more rubels to fill the gap! /S
Seriously that is actually a problem. The gold is worth $23.7billion or so. Some of the rest will be in RMB, but I can not tell how much. Russia can always print Rubel and force its industry to take it.
I do hope that the industry taking it will just slightly delay devaluation and boom! more inflation.
I mean, one way or another, whether Russia devalues the currency and transfers real wealth away from people -- mostly in Russia -- holding the ruble or ruble-tied assets, or whether they tax people, or whether they just seize assets, it all is gonna ultimately do more-or-less the same thing. Some people in Russia are gonna be paying for the war. Might be more one group than another or have different side effects, but the Kremlin can't just magic up real wealth out of nowhere. They gotta take it from people in Russia.
They can, but they are already dealing with high inflation and extremely high federal interest rates to try to stamp it down. Printing your way out of the problem will likely produce a larger problem.
Putin will probably go for it rather than admit he made a horrid choice two years ago.
You mean they will go for printer go brr?
Yes, please!
high inflation
goes to look
It's at 9.1% as of last month. That's way up from around 5.1% last year, but...it's definitely rising quickly, and it'd be very high for folks here in the US, but it's not that high relative to what Russia has done in the past.
https://tradingeconomics.com/russia/inflation-cpi
It was at something like 17% in early 2022, 16% in 2015.
And like 2,300% in December 1992, though I would assume -- hope -- that the Kremlin wouldn't be trying to intentionally induce a situation like that with the aim of prolonging the war.
Yeah, it certainly isn't untenable in Russia right now. The main issue is that they are running out of levers to pull, so conditions that exasperate the issue don't have solid counter-balancing options.
Two solid levers are to defend the currency (requires spending forex reserves to buy up rubles) and raising central bank interest rates. We see the reserves are drawing down in OP's post and the central bank rates are already at 18% (compared to ~5.5% in the US). The high interest rates increasingly handycap your economy as you push them higher. At 18%, it is already nearing credit card levels of interest simply to finance safe loans.
Things aren't dire for Russia today, but they are getting closer and closer to a situation they may not be able to pull out of in the future.
Can we get it down to $0?
Probably not, because Russia will cut other spending or increase taxation or something prior to that. They're going to want some amount of reserves.
That being said, what's probably interesting to most is constraining Russia's spending on the war, and that happens if Russia isn't willing to let reserves fall below a given point.
There’s only so many shell games they can play before the house of cards starts to come down. They are HURTING economically and financially. It’s not sustainable for them. This whole war was a giant gamble, and the longer it goes, the worse the odds for Russia. Granted, they’re not great for Ukraine either as time progresses, but they don’t really have a choice in the matter. As long as Ukraine can hold out reasonably well for the foreseeable future, I’m actually pretty optimistic for them in the long run.
So I don't know enough about how sustainable the thing is to evaluate this myself, but there's some woman whose name I can't remember, but who has shown up on a number of interview panels with Michael Kofman (who is usually doing the hard power side of things) and Dara Massicot. She specializes in the economic and political-economic side of things in Russia, and every time she's come up, she's said more-or-less that at the level of burn that Russia's doing, it's sustainable. Doesn't mean that it's a good idea for Russia to do so, but that Russia's not going to explode economically as long as the desire to keep doing what they're doing is there; that's not a bottleneck as things stand.
Let me see if I can find her name.
kagis
Alexandra Prokopenko at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.
https://carnegieendowment.org/people/alexandra-prokopenko?lang=en¢er=russia-eurasia
Alexandra Prokopenko is a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. She is a visiting fellow at the Center for Order and Governance in Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia at the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP).
In her research, she focuses on Russian government policymaking on economic and financial issues.
From 2017 until early 2022 Alexandra worked at the Central Bank of Russia and at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow. She is a former columnist for Vedomosti. She is a graduate of Moscow State University and holds an MA in Sociology from the University of Manchester.
Let me see if I can go find something somewhat-recent where she's talking about it.
EDIT: Yeah, here's a 2-month-old video with a DW interview, "How Long Can Putin Afford to Wage War in Ukraine?". Haven't seen this one. Lemme watch through it, put a summary up.