this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1374 readers
243 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This bill requires Web browsers to have an easy-to-find (and use) setting for consumers to send an opt-out preference signal by default to every site and app they interact with.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Link…you’re finally awake…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

At its Dec. 8, 2023 board meeting, the agency noted that browsers that natively support opt-out preference signals (Mozilla Firefox, DuckDuckGo, and Brave) currently make up less than 10% of the global desktop browser market.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fighting the uphill battle yet again. And yet again, this is gonna fail because many, if not most websites will either ignore it completely or find a workaround to keep selling your data. After all, what are they gonna do, sue every company that does this? Not to mention that Do Not Track is already a thing, and it doesn't work because any site that relies on ads for money isn't gonna stop tracking you just because you asked nicely, and the ones that do are already more respecting of user privacy anyway.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

GDPR gave us the cookie banner that both consumers and website owners hate. Legislation absolutely can affect change.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Not to mention, the GDPR has teeth... I don't know if ignoring the opt out would be a GDPR violation, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised.

And while the laws aren't remotely in the same jurisdiction, no browser is going to provide a different version just for California, so European users will likely get this as well.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Doing this at a browser level has always been the sensible method, instead of requiring it at the site level.