this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8247 readers
32 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No fire :/ ah no wait there is a little merry fire

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

In this case, even without fire it would still be good. You’d want to hit the productive parts which would be hard to replace, and not necessarily the easily replaceable fuel tanks. The amount of fuel lost is one hit, while pretty can be replaceable, but if you make that surviving batch of fuel the last batch…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That AA artillery was really a show! ruzzkis know how to competently protect their assets.

😂

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately for the residents of Moscow, all Russian AA weapons are currently in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

are being currently destroyed in Ukraine.

😉

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Damn. They could be hitting the Kremlin?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t they hit a window in some FSB/war ministry building in Moscow a year or so ago?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I seem to recall that attack was not claimed by Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd guess the Kremlin has an air defense system and either the drone or the projectile would be shot down before it could do damage

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And even if not, that seems just inflammatory and way more easily harnessed for huge propaganda wins for Putin & co, as opposed to suffocating like hitting refineries, airfields or other similarly painful and impactful but also further-from-the-everyday-people’s-minds-and-eyes targets.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

if putin would be in the kremlin during the attack, he wouldn't be able to use it for propaganda ☠ but I doubt he's in there often. probably hiding most of the time, then do a few surprise appearances so he can't get ambushed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not a military target, and definitely not an intelligence target.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It isn't? AFAIK the whole decision making apparatus of the military and intelligence services are all there, neatly tucked between civilian stuff like museum etc..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

The net effect of a strike like that would not destroy Russian intelligence, only increase it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

No, I know. I just know that Russia doesn't respect rules of engagement, so the thought has probably occurred to some of them.