this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
26 points (79.5% liked)

Star Trek

10600 readers
9 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.

New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?

Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.

2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.

3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.

4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.

5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.

6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.

7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.

Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-07 LD 5x04 "A Farewell to Farms"
11-14 LD 5x05 "Starbase 80?!"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angels"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"

Episode Discussion Archive

In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series

Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
26
[Speculation] Will Star Trek: Discovery Season 5 explain the Romulan Supernova? – Trek Central (trekcentral.net)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Uhm, I don’t need the Romulan Supernova to be tied up with a bow.

But I also appreciate that writers like to be able to be the ones to bring closure to their own stories. Alex Kurtzman was the cowriter of Star Trek (2009). I can see how he would like to be the one to lay down the incontrovertible canon that ties the loose ends that the Kelvin movies and Picard have left us with. And he’s co Showrunner of Discovery so it was his vehicle to do it with.

So, I would be cool if this resolves some things and helps us to understand better the butterfly effect that destroyed a civilization, split the resilient Prime time and perhaps even give us some deeper hints on what caused the Mirror Universe to split off.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It doesn’t really need to.

There’s enough evidence with the shear amount of canon inaccuracies in Discovery, Picard S1 & S2, LD & SNW that they are actually set in the Kelvin timeline.

They can’t all be down to bad writing, a lot of them sure, but not all.

The whole premise of the supernova in ST 09 was the product of terrible writing.

“A supernova that threatened the galaxy.”

That’s simply not how supernova work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No spoiler warning?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

...for what? The Romulan supernova was in the '09 film.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Sorry haha, I forgot to put the /s at the end. My mistake.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Even the Romulan-heavy Star Trek: Picard Season 1 avoided addressing or explaining the supernova in any detail.

Explaining? Stars go supernova occasionally, there's your explanation. There doesn't need to be further cause or intervention behind it.

IMO this is a solution (or really several) looking for a problem that just doesn't exist. As it stands and despite fan speculation, Romulus was destroyed by a natural disaster, which is actually something that happens on Earth and in the wider universe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Explaining? Stars go supernova occasionally, there’s your explanation. There doesn’t need to be further cause or intervention behind it.

Stars don't just randomly supernova. Stars have extremely predictable lifecycles. It's hard to believe a warp-capable species never made it past a 19th century understanding of how their sun works, especially given how fundamental the underlying principles are to our own ability to observe and understand the universe.

It's a plot hole in ST '09, though I agree that maybe it is best ignored unless they can come up with a truly compelling explanation.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Stars go supernova occasionally

Not spontaneously, with only a handful of years' notice, they don't.

I'm all for Trek science being a little weird, but it seems very likely that there was some funny business going on for the star to suddenly blow up and threaten the entire galaxy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, with Star Trek-level technology, you should be able to tell to the week when a star will nova about 10,000 years in advance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

The wiggle room within Star Trek is that the Tkon Empire was supposedly wiped out by a supernova despite being a highly advanced civilization, and in "Second Sight" the DS9 crew boosts the top speed of a ship to warp 9.5, which suggests that a supernova can have superliminal consequences.

But there's nothing to suggest the Tkon supernova was a natural phenomenon, and the hijinks they were up to in "Second Sight" certainly wasn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Especially since 2009 had it not be the romulan star, but one near enough for the shockwave to tank Romulus

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's from tie-in material, not the film itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

From the script:

SPOCK PRIME: (voice-over) That is where I'm from, Jim. The future. The star went supernova...

SPOCK PRIME: (voice-over) ...consuming everything in its path. I promised the Romulans that I would save their planet...

If the sun in question was the Romulan star, then turning it into a black hole to contain the explosion would not save the planet.

Killing the star would not save their planet.

Anything involving Romulus' star means that 'saving the planet' is completely impossible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Anything involving Romulus’ star means that ‘saving the planet’ is completely impossible.

Eventually, yes, but if it were possible to collapse the exploding star in a way that didn't totally roast the planet it would buy a fair bit of time to continue the evacuation. It'll get very cold and photosynthesis will stop, but with enough power and food, the population could hang on for several years if needed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I agree that that part of the dialogue is problematic. However, "Picard" definitively stated that it was the Romulan star.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Star Trek Online already explained it:

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Indeed, the article devotes three paragraphs to that explanation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The idea had crossed my mind, and the timeline of the "ancient artifact" lines up well enough. I'd also like to see the Romulan supernova addressed...

However, I'd actually prefer it to be handled by "Lower Decks", which is set in that rough timeframe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Prodigy is in about the right time period too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

They made the Koala angry