this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
1275 points (98.0% liked)

ADHD memes

8019 readers
249 users here now

ADHD Memes

The lighter side of ADHD


Rules

  1. No Party Pooping

Other ND communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"None of this has anything to do with your ability to perform the desired task" is the major flaw in this. Social interaction is a pretty huge part of any job where you work with people, and so-called "chemistry matches" are often rated as the top thing teams are looking for. This is why so many hiring managers will bring in other team members into interviews.

Edit: just because you don't like this fact doesn't make it less true. People want to work with other people that they don't want to strangle.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yea...no...you're not taking a 4 round interview for one little task. That job is going to have bullshit corporate politics attached to it. If you can't make it through that interview you're not going to make it through the bullshit corporate politics.

If it's really a simple task, it'll be two rounds, and pay like ass.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I've been consistently top performing in all my positions with glowing reviews from all my managers. I can play with the corporate game very well. And yet almost all my jobs were found through networking and the few interview cycles I've attempted were always failures, often surprising the people who vouched for me on how bad I was at interviewing. I'm talking failed interviews which I ended up getting in demoted through another neurospicy person fighting for the me against management, only for me to outperform everyone else by 50%.

These are not the same skills.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yea but I think part of the point is the corporate politics are not required to do the job, they are required to work at that company.

Also what the op finds simple may not be to average people, but if they have specialized skills and training, it becomes a 'simple' task.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't see the distinction. For example, I code...but to get my code out I have to deal with like 4 other teams and their ridiculousness...

If I were at a smaller shop, I'd have to be better at dealing with my coworkers and maybe the customers.

As dumb as some of the interview process is, it does indeed weed out people who won't be good in that environment.

(With that said, I've been in completely adversarial interviews that had nothing to do with the work in question and was just an opportunity for the principle to shit on his lessers).

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't worry, once you get the job you'll discover that they lied about what the work is anyway. You thought the job was sitting quietly at a desk and solving little dev tasks. Actually that's 25% of the job, the rest is: 25% meetings where they make doing the little tasks harder, confusing, and miserable, 25% other tasks you aren't good at and that aren't part of your job, and the last 25% is more meetings about those other things. The ratios will adjust over time until only about 10% of your job is doing your job, and the other 90% is email and meetings.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So many god damn meetings could be a fucking email - or a group chat.

Or skipped.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is why jesus invented mobile games

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The last job I had where I was in the office full time would make the entire team sit through a 3-4 hour meeting with the clients. Well, not with the clients. The clients would be on the phone arguing with each other about what the requirements were. There were almost never any action items beyond "Clients will discuss requirements for next week."

We were not allowed to have our phones in the meeting. We were not allowed to doodle in the meeting. We had to sit there - for 3-4 hours a week - listening to people argue over a bad VOIP connection.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It was over a decade ago so options were limited

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The only way this could get any worse would be if the clients were natively speaking another language (one that you do not understand), would fall back to that five minutes into argueing among themselves, and after another five minutes, you hear your own name mentioned.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Am I the only one with adhd who's good at and enjoys networking? Most of it is just asking specific questions based on prior information you've been given by the other person.

Really important is identifying a topic the other is passionate about, maybe it's not even work related, but a hobby or a travel experience they've had. Then you get them to "teach" you about it by asking them to elaborate and maybe even explain specific parts of their hobby, and voila you've succeeded in networking.

People are passionate about their skills and hobbies, and most love to elaborate and explain the specifics of it, especially when they usually don't get to do it.

Remember those "Joe is forcing us to see his travel pictures" joke? This is basically that but you're actually interested in the pictures. Listening to someone being passionate about something is a lot more fun than others lead you to believe, give it a try, it's basically nt infodumping.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm really great at networking. It's the only way I've found to find new jons. I still suck at interviewing though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Really important is identifying a topic the other is passionate about, maybe it’s not even work related, but a hobby or a travel experience they’ve had. Then you get them to “teach” you about it by asking them to elaborate and maybe even explain specific parts of their hobby, and voila you’ve succeeded in networking.

This works until you try it in DC and suddenly everyone is an analyst at the State Department and when you ask what they analyze they say "data."

They also don't have hobbies they're willing to talk about, and tend not to have strong feelings about music or TV or books or, really, anything.

I do not like networking in DC.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Networking in DC is an extreme sport

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My most talented coworker was a contractor that was hired on full time. He has repeatedly said he would never have made it through the hiring process. I think about that a lot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Because it is bullshit. HR have no clue how to find good candidates, and whoever hired them to get a new hire had no idea what the new hire should be able to do and so just gave HR a few buzzwords to work with. But even if they had been given a good job description, they are basically muppets.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I got insanely lucky wit my job. I responded to an email that came through my college CS department about a potential job and got an in-person interview with the CEO of a tiny company nobody has heard of. The guy's personality made it easier to talk to him despite my anxiety.

Instead of the bullshit riddles that every other tech job interview has, he sent me home with a simple assignment to make a simple webpage where a user could log in.

After submitting that, I kinda forgot about it until several month later when I randomly decide to check my school email account and found an email from him that was almost a month old (my PC wasn't working before that, and I didn't need to use it much at the time).

I replied just in time. 12 years later I'm the most senior developer.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where you really lucked out here was that the project is still going after 12 years and you haven't been through some bullshit outsourcing/insourcing cycle that clears out everyone who knows what they are doing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. We have a bunch of clients so I can be on several projects at a time. And it's a privately owned company that, to my knowledge, the owner has no intention of selling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I did before I left that comment. I just wanted to make sure you knew that community existed since this meme really has nothing to do with ADHD and everything to do with autism, and you posted it in the ADHD community.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I've posted in ausome memes a bunch already ;)

load more comments
view more: next ›