I don't know much about UK politics, but I know I hate rich people. Good on them.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
140 points (97.9% liked)
News
23296 readers
3202 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I guess this is the one Tory policy they aren't onboard with
There is no justification in a country this size for them to be traveling by air at all unless it's an emergency where they're needed somewhere absolutely ASAP, or they need to travel directly from one end of the country to the other, which is almost never.
Just one more way in which those in power separate themselves from those they rule over.
Doesn't London have notoriously bad traffic? I can imagine that might be some justification.
It's got good trains.
This dude is a plebeian-fucking hedge fund cocksucker
In 2023, Mr Sunak reversed an initial decision to stop leasing the two Agusta Westland helicopters.
Senior ministers will instead use government-owned vehicles such as RAF helicopters when needed for operational reasons
It looks like these Sloane guys operate AgustaWestland 109E helicopters.
https://www.sloanehelicopters.com/flight-operations/32-squadron
So what are these RAF helicopters that will replace them?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_Kingdom_military_aircraft
They do have one category there of RAF helicopters for transport of government ministers
Leonardo AW109SP Used for transportation of senior military commanders or government ministers.[31]
I mean, that's...the next model of the same helicopter. Is that actually less-expensive?
A "benefit" of using RAF helos is it the flight hours. Pilots typically need a certain number of flight hours every month to maintain their certs, so they'll likely be flying anyways. Having them fly senior ministers around instead of other training flights technically is free, as the flights were going to happen anyways.
I mean, that’s…the next model of the same helicopter. Is that actually less-expensive?
I would guess the government doesn't need to profit from buying flights from itself. A private company certainly isn't going to provide service without a percentage of profit on top charged to the government.
Pretty sure the expensive part is hiring a 3rd party to do the job instead of themselves, not the operating costs of the vehicle.
get bullied, fucker!
My disappointment is immeasurable and my day ruined.
The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Independent:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-helicopter-rishi-sunak-b2602220.html