World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Only, if he hadn't started a special military operation none of this would be happening.
The fact that he feels the need to say this is a sign of his vulnerability, of the pressure he feels. The chorus of voices is only going to grow louder as Ukraine kills and captures more and more soldiers, more conscripts.
Putin blaming the security forces is the beginning of the end for him. The domestic security apparatus is the only thing keeping him in power.
Eeeeeehh, this is how the czarist system (and really monarchies in general) always worked. The king is the Good Father; fuckups or moral failings are because of the Bad Councilors.
People know the deal going in.
He may be weak, probably is, but I don't think this specifically is necessarily the sign to look for.
But the czarist system has the feature that given enough fuckups, the czar is removed in a palace coup. And given that the oligarchs have been hit quite hard by sanctions and that the "Special" military operation hasn't exactly gone to plan. It seems only a matter of time before it happens.
Fingers crossed!
None of us know this, everytime we see something not go their way we talk like this hut truth is we have no clue. Putin has kept people in check for a long time, he is good at it. 2 years ago it was cancer, and everytime there is anstrategic win we talk about cracks and thw beginning of the end.
The russian people enjoy living in shit to spite all the westerners.
"Maybe our leaders abuse us, but have you seen how good we are at taking it?"
That's quality leadership for you.
I wish him many 'not his faults' for the future!
That’s real leadership right there.
The relevant piece is the conclusion at the end of the transcript linked in the OP.
I feel like Politico misinterpretated this. He didn't say it's on them (not him), and didn't blame anyone explicitly, he meant this topic is not a part of this public conversation, and it'd be dealt by them. This, as a piece of the whole picture, does mean something tho.
The issue is exhaustingly downplayed. Most of the conversation is held about evacuation, monetary help (now it's $150!), the start of the school year, and not much is even said about security. One of the topics, the armament of civilian forces of territorial defence, and later these 'problems ... of security forces', sounds not unlike what could've been told before the attack, or before the 2k22 invasion itself. No reassuring speeches, not even an aknowledgement that a part of the region is under foreign AF.
He still evades that, distances himself. He traditionally disappeared when shit hit the fan, even went to other country for a meeting (a political suicide in places where politics are practiced) and did not comment anything at all. And after two weeks the response is not unlike those he could say about a natural disaster that 'just happened'. Hurr-durr, let your people cooperate with emergency services and cops, and let's play it cool. BTW, let's make schools open on a schedule, okay?
I'm not from Kursk, but I think it's not in any sense encouraging for locals. Moreso, these terr-defence forces inspire more fear than security: how'd they recruit people and how disciplined are they if given weapons? And with such priorities, it doesn't sound they want to sacrifice their onslaught elsewhere to take these territories back. Times and times again russian citizens are told to just deal with it. And, depressingly yet unsurprisingly, they would.
2k22? Why not 2022
OP works for EA.
Why not 2.022k?
I'm vibing with the youngsters. That's been said, I've forgotten to update my Twitter bio in a while.
One less number, duh
Putin should stick to what he does best, poisoning panties
Dude, I know Russia has poisoned people... But panties? That's a new one for me.
Dirty undies . . . the whites!
Navalny pants, dude.
The last resort of defense-obsessed dictator is the Shaggy air defense^TM^ when losing actual "historic russian lands". 😆
Yeah. it has nothing to do with invading ukraine. nothing at all. /s
Who else could it be then ?
Gotta socialize the failures, it's what the people would want.
Putin really doing a lot to erode any chance Russia ever controls Kursk again
I'd love to hear whose fucking fault it was then. Someone's gotta go out of a 8th floor window next week
I mean, it's clearly Ukraine's fault. They invaded, whose else's fault could be?
If Ukraine didn't invade, would those territories be occupied by Ukraine?
There, your answer.
And if it was, I didn't mean it
And if I did mean it, you deserved it
Then why do they need to be ruled by Moscow?