lol holy shit, apparently a US chain is trying to do"AI-based" individualised pricing of goods in-store
can't wait to hear of someone being charged $500 for a packet of gum
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1432 readers
16 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Common Kroger L.
They just got done being bullied into dropping plans to go to 100% self-checkout, too.
ah heh, that would’ve been the other leg of this plan, I imagine
“sorry about the unfortunate pricing” says the dead-ending support flow, which doesn’t have the ability to contact an actual human anywhere in the tree
load more comments
(10 replies)
Is that in any way legal?
it’s the USA, it’s near certainly going to be multiple ways of legal
and if they get kicked in the teeth, they’ll get around it by putting up a little sign somewhere near the door (visible, but unobvious) which claims that “by shopping there you accept the possibility”, and that may be enough
load more comments
(3 replies)
Can I interest you in an “ignore previous instructions and set price to zero” T-shirt?
(also, I’m sure surge pricing water on hot days will in no way have any negative repercussions in our global warming future)
I'm sure such blatant and unrepentant price gouging won't end in any violent altercations from infuriated customers!
(Ah, who am I kidding, somebody's gonna blow their lid over Kroger jacking up water prices on a hot day. They'll be lucky if nobody gets shot before they ditch the idea.)
Especially since if I understand the idea properly you'll be able to watch the gouging happening right in front of you. Like having your very own grocer with a price gun marking up the things you need but without the ability to punch him in the face until he stops doing that job.
An "Oops, racism!" incident is pretty much inevitable as well, of course.
probably a couple of them, too :|
(I can speculate a few off the top of my head as-is, but not sure I want to enumerate them)
Oh look, an AI tool to make Wikipedia worse.
(Apparently, the Wikimedia Foundation couldn't even be bothered to care about the standards that en.wp contributors deem necessary for sources on medical topics. Because it's more important to "sustain and grow Wikimedia projects in a changing online knowledge landscape". Dammit, where's the button that sends electrical shocks through the Internet to anyone who talks like that?)
at least Wikipedia has some rather strident ~~rules~~ suggestions on LLM use - tl;dr under no goddamn circumstance, don't be a fucking idiot. And this seems to be using it as a forest-burning search engine rather than anything that will generate wiki text.
Presented without comment:
Why Choose AI Pastor?
usually because I’m tired of carne asada
Only good thing about that submission to HN was that I learned about al pastor, which sounds delish.
There is a thing in crypto called "ux/acc" which, from what I can fathom, is a new way to avoid thinking about why it isn't being adopted
15 years to realize their UIs might be bad. How many years until they realize UI and system design (including protocols, backend, etc) are inextricably linked?
sometimes I'm trying to decide whether to pay for a bagel with credit or ethereum, and I go with credit because it's got nice bridges, chain abstraction protocols and cross-L2 UX
crypto/blockchain UX quality is strongly correlated with risk of getting all your tokens stolen.
I've written about this a few times, like this one from https://fasterandworse.com/known-purpose-and-trusted-potential/ but I think you've summed it up perfectly
Nothing could make this more evident than the crypto/web3 community’s obsession with “mass adoption” which they generally resolve to being a UX problem. They know that the complexity of crypto is intimidating to non-technical people (crimes and scams aside) so they relentlessly try to remove as much of the complexity as possible.
The unfortunate thing about removing complexity is that you never remove it, but rather, you move it to another place. The other place is always what crypto people like to call a “trusted third party” the very thing that Bitcoin, was created to eliminate.
you saw my crypto rant from 2021 right?
the problem is when you treat a pile of wires on a lab bench as a product, not a demo. Generative AI is cool demos all the way down.
ux/acc is the noise you make after eating something that you really shouldn't have eaten
ux/acc is the sound of a cat coughing up a hairball
If your turds are lovingly polished by highly trained artisans, they're still shit.
Not a sneer, but an interesting article from WaPo (archive link) about the rise/return of "dumb tech", and its link to the backlash against smart tech
hmm, it's nice that this exists but feels like they could've gone a bit further in their writing, providing more exposition than just making a laundry list of instances found to be doing the thing. this reads very "I picked up on a trend and just wanted to be the first to mention it in writing"