this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Conservative

384 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Isn't it interesting how Republican legislators can introduce bills for every damn thing except the fundamental issue they are so invested in ringing alarm bells over.

It's been almost 4 years of hand wringing over the border and I can only remember 2 bills put forward. The first was ridiculously unworkable and the second -while not perfect- was at least the strongest suggestion in years and had provisions that republicans were asking for. But oh no, Trump didn't want the situation fixed, so everybody turned against the bill saying it was terrible, it was written by RINO hacks, worst bill ever written, etc.

The fact is republicans don't want a secure border, because then they wouldn't have the threat of mexican rapists to scare people with. Constantly crying about immigrants and the border is a useful distraction. If republicans really wanted the issue fixed, they would put effort into fixing it. Democrats could be pushed into cooperation but republicans don't want that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You still believe fox news?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@Sgt_choke_n_stroke So you're saying that the article is correct then?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The point is to let other states feel pain since Democrats lack empathy.

This bill helps keep that pain going.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

The bill only punishes sanctuary cities that send to non-sanctuary cities.

That sounds fair to me. If you want to be a sanctuary city, accept the consequences.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Moral superiority makes Democrats feel good, but they don't really care. This is why Democrats must be taught a lesson. They encourage illegal immigration by having sanctuary laws, so border states should transport migrants to the lands of opportunity and freedom. NYC mayor Eric Adams tried to criminalize buses carrying illegals while keeping the sanctuary laws. Democrats pretend to be like Harriet Tubman, operating in the Underground Railroad until they have to pay the money and make room for crowds that come uninvited.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Who hires illegal migrants in the US heart land to work warehouses?

Asking for a friend

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

That was an interesting bit of mental gymnastics you just pulled off.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yes. They hate Americans who disagree with them and want to hurt them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Show us on this doll where the Democrats want to hurt you, please

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In the wages is the easiest example.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They aren't exactly helping things, are they now?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I didn't mention the GOP, stay on topic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What gave you that opinion? Historically they've been called "bleeding heart" liberals because they care too much.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They care too much about everyone but Americans. They hate Americans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

They are slacktivist. They care enough to raises your taxes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ah nice, we're back to Ann Coulter in 2006: "why do you hate America??" anytime someone disagrees with conservative policies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

@zeppo @Kaboom Ugh. I might be conservative, but I hate it when people do that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well no, not back. Democrats have kept hating Americans this entire time.

For the record, the voters don't all hate Americans. Some just don't know any better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That’s a pretty bizarre point of view if that’s what you actually believe. It’s not really a meaningful political stance.

Anyway, what I mean is being back to republicans saying stupid crap like “you hate America” versus something substantive. It’s basically what you’d get having a discussion with someone with NPD.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I also hate Americans who disagree with and want to hurt me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, I could have phrased it better.

Democrats hate those who disagree.

Democrats want to hurt those who disagree.

Better?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I feel like there's a jean-paul Sartre quote that applies here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Well, it's deranged bullshit projection, but it's grammatical.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you just go around making these claims up? You're getting banned for calling for violence in other communities. You're a walking liability.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No I'm not advocating for violence. For fucks sake, how do you get that from my comment? Unless sending more illegals to DNC places is violence, Im not advocating for jack shit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how. I said what they think, not that I agreed with them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If this place lets you in, maybe it's not the place for me

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I haven't been banned from any instances, so maybe sh.itjust.works isn't for you

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"I've only pissed off people with LIMITED power. You must be wrong." Get professional help.

This is the last comment I'm putting in this shitty community.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

It shouldn't matter if I pissed them off. What should matter is if I broke the rules.