And they won't without bloodshed... Thinking that it can be done diplomatically is noble but I sincerely can't see it
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
126 points (93.2% liked)
World News
38578 readers
2097 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Well, yeah. Maduro knows what giving up power does to a dictator's life expectancy.
Brazil has a long list of dictators that abandoned power and did just fine. As a sibling commented, so does Argentina. I can only remember Peru in South America that made a fuss about it... and then reversed course.
But holding to it when things escalate does usually end very badly.
Left wing dictators maybe. Pinochet did just fine after handing things over.
Well mussolini was the og right wing dictator and he didn't have a fun end
Mussolini was the OG fascist. Certainly not any OG dictator.
Well he also like lost WW2...
The OG right wing dictators are called kings.
(Also literal Roman dictators)
Technically, there was no right wing as we understand it today before the French revolution. The left sat to the left of the king (represented the people) and the right...to the right (represented the nobility and the clergy). The king was supposed to be in the "middle" and arbitrate.
The romans had two factions in the Senate which you could associate with right/left: the optimates and the populares. e.g. Caesar, a dictator, was in the populares (a populist?), so according to your anachronistic view he was a left-wing dictator.
There are more examples of kings that tried to reduce the power of the nobility by appealing to the common people, distribute wealth and build infrastructure.
There are more examples of kings that tried to reduce the power of the nobility by appealing to the common people, distribute wealth and build infrastructure.
That's how absolutism came to be, strengthening of royal power as opposed to that of nobles, making the royal army stronger without vassal troops, and that infrastructure being built too strengthened central power.
Yea, absolutism took power away from everyone into the state at a time when states were embodied in kings.