374
Lauren Boebert tried to win a battle of wits with Pete Buttigieg. She lost.
(www.lgbtqnation.com)
She could win the public handy J competition though
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
374 points (94.7% liked)
politics
19050 readers
3821 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ngl I'd smash
Ever see the movie Teeth?
Two words: chainmail condom (or three words if you're really English and hate compound nouns)
I mean... didn't she fail at that since she was busted?
Guess she really blew it
heyoooooo!!!
Only because Pete is too classy to do out in the open.
Exactly. Handy J’s are a private and sacred thing.
Weird. She doesn't do so good with a male she can't give a handjob to in a public theater with children there. Oh well...
She'd lose battle of wits against a stuffed iguana. She's essentially unarmed
She's very weird.
Weren't she and like ten other top, younger GOP candidates and influencers formerly models with no interest in politics until someone apparently started paying them to share extreme rhetoric instead of whatever the fuck they used to get up to?
Very, very weird.
Crazy story about how boebert, candace owens, tomi lahren and more of that type of vapid, gop agent of chaos - all started on a sketchy "modeling agency" website (which seems like it's also used as an escort service potentially) called "explore talent"?
It shows some of these "political pundits" in revealing, suggestive poses and is run by an Israeli pornographer with ties to organized crime (Name is Ami Shafrir and he is suspected/accused of some other pretty serious stuff).
Here are some of the photos that were captured (with watermark):
Here's boebert (this photo really shows you her roots as the illegitimate daughter of a deadbeat amateur wrestler from Florida).
And I guess, until recently at least, candice owens' whole profile was still up.
There's always another layer to these cartoon villains and their evil, desperation and ignorance.
Read through the whole thing. Holy shite.
Sounds like the website is more of an aggregator and not really like these people were affiliated with it. And I guess it would make sense that amongst so many good looking people (them tramp stamps though), they'd have profiles pop up on that sort of aggregator.
Like I have websites that track my name and basic professional details and I have no affiliation with the sites. They scraped my data and while they pose as a "directory" it's really an ad.
Sorry, not sure what you're referencing with mention of an aggregator? Can you source what you're claiming?
It just seems to me how like LinkedIn has pages for people even though the people aren't members, they create the pages just on information they've scraped from the web to make it look like the person has an account on that site.
I don't know if that's the case with how that website works, but the description of it made it sound like that's exactly what it does.
My impression was the opposite. These were profiles deliberately setup, by people like boebert, for this "talent agency" to gain work. And the guy that runs it all had known connections to the right wing network and is essentially an Israeli mobster IIRC facilitating connections with conservative politicians and "news" networks.
Aggregators crawl the web to find similar interests and lump em together, for ease and also to generat3 revenue. Personally I see them mostly in stuff like manga sites and lookup sites.
What this may mean for the poster is not that he's disagreeing with the actors statement, but more that they probably all aren't directly affiliated with the one site. They may have had profiles up with different sites and agencies and this one site has crawled and pulled their info into a more easily searchable database. That in turn would make this a bit less collaborative, and perhaps more emblematic of a common trait than a specific strategy.
Exactly what I was suggesting. I had previously thought it was the former, but the description of the site makes it sound like it's a product of common traits (skankery, slampiggery even).
(Image: Lauren Boebert's face from post thumbnail-- ¾ angle. She has a very forced, mostly terrifying smile. The image is edited with a crudely drawn witch hat and text reads, "I'll grope you my pretty, and your little dog too".)
They call me Cuban Pete!
Was also thinking, "LET ME SHOW YOU SOMETHING!!!"
I'm glad you saw it, I restrained myself from adding... SSAAAAMMOOKKIINNNNN!!!!!
The terming “pulling out” is lost on Boebert.
Nah. Trust she's an expert at it, as good as one could be.
How many kids does she have? I guess we won't know how many abortions and day-after pills she's had so maybe you're right. All I'm saying is, it's got to be relative. We saw Boebert just in a theater full of families. God damn, some of the shit she's got up to probably at house parties and bonfire parties and what not. And like, obviously she had a kid very young, right, and then several others I think? So she's obviously not used much in the way of contraception, which means she's only doing pull out, and as many kids as she has, she doesn't have an absurd amount, like she doesn't have twenty or thirty of them. That's pretty good, relatively.
Bimboert couldn't win a battle of wits against a toilet brush.
She'd try and blow the handle
I'm sure she's had dirtier things in her mouth.
...this week
I like when she fails, but that was weak sauce and I feel robbed of my time for having read that.
She doesn’t have to win. She just needs the attention and to be seen as battling the other.
I don't like Buttigieg, but he's clever and charismatic while she's stupid.
view more: next ›