Rules:
News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.
Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.
Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.
Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.
Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.
Communities We Like:
X exists because P and Q wanted her, and F was at that time no more than a means to an end.
Seems pretty cut and dry to me, P and Q should be the parents on the birth certificate.
That headline is a wild ride
When somone loses patience, and decides to just "fuck it"
Read the article, it's even wilder!
Well that was a horror show to read.
Pretty much.
TLDR; Lesbian couple got a third party to donate via artificial insemination, after a few attempts it didn't seem to work, one of the Lesbians (unknown to her partner) had sex with the third party, and either way a kid came from it. The couple later divorced, they were trying to determine the visitation rights, when it comes out that the child might have been conceived in a manner that wasn't from artificial insemination, thus the non-genetic mother was stricken from the birth certificate. Think it left off on both the mothers and third parties were getting custody or something.
Thank you for that summary because there's no way I'm reading the details on a Friday night and that headline is shit and the other comments here assume that the article was read. I can get some rest now.
Who could have possibly predicted an “informal conception arrangement” might lead to a fight over the birth certificate?
I wonder if this is more about the bio mother hurting her ex-wife, or going after the donor/fuckbuddy for financial support?