this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
126 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37569 readers
574 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The nostalgia is strong in this one, I love these discoveries.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Man THIS is what the Internet was all about

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

The next one contained a Flintstones rule 34 image, which I won’t include here for obvious reasons.

;-;

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

So how does the heavier-when-inflated bowling pin man work? Does it thrust downwards somehow?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Likely answer —we're being nerds and reading too much into it.

No—
—3 lbs of thrust isn't going to be happening, speaking from experience with model planes.
—3lbs of the air inside is compressed and weighs more is even farther from possible.

Likely—
—It only has the battery, fan, whatever when it's running, and they don't count that when it's uninflated for some reason. Like how cars have dry weight, curb weight, and gvrw.
—somewhere in the spec sheets, someone made a mistake, two people worked on things and rounded differently, some other clerical/communicative error.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It could also be just what it "feels like", based on the measurement method of "made it the fuck up".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So how does the heavier-when-inflated bowling pin man work?

Usually from 9 to 5.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lucky. Seems like the sort of thing that would be gig work these days.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How do these contain random files like this? Isn’t it just a file that applies some kind of visual effect to the media player?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The author touches on this near the beginning-

Winamp skins are actually just zip files with a different file extension

So they're treating them like archives and extracting them

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Everything is just a zip file with a different extension

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I take issue with "everything", as most things are not. But it is a common trick when a developer wants to make a "new" file format that encapsulates a bunch of different files.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Everything, including you, is a .zip file.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's just .zip files all the way down

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I just came here to say stuffit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Transcription is just unzipping your coding

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Seriously though, it's been some time be afaik any microsoft product file that ends in x, .docx, .xlsx, .pbix are all just archives and you can totally interact with them programmatically if you want. Really easy to corrupt them but hey, found it interesting years ago.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They're zip files, with the extension renamed. So you could probably have almost anything in one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wonder how using a zip bomb works out...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I was thinking of moving my "system32" porn archive into a winamp skin. Teenage me would be very proud

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh so they’re actually created the same way as a zip file? That makes sense I guess. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is literally a zip file. If I remember correctly you have to write some xml which describes the layout of the skin and then include any images you need, you then zip it and change the file extension to wsz. So really you could put anything in a skin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a common design pattern for “packages”.

Winamp uses a pattern called package management for its skins. Same as chrome extensions, etc etc. Most of the time we don’t call it that because the term is more reserved for package sets which provide a wider array of functionality. The iOS app store is a package management system.

The packages, much like boxes being handled by FedEx, contain standardized elements which allow that package management system to find and install the package. Much like how when you ship a box through FedEx the first thing they do is put standardized labels on that contain all the different barcodes that different parts of their process use to route the package.

Like with Chrome extensions, there are certain files that must be there (iirc something like a manifest.json file) and others which can be anything. If you need an image for a button, that image becomes part of the package. If you need a complex set of rules then maybe there’s a little sqlite file or csv file containing all the rules. Or font files, or whatever.

Thing is, the package format is defined by the “box” as opposed to by the “contents of the box”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Just to put this in context:

There's only so many ways to turn a bunch of files into one - mainly, you stick them back to back. Easy.

Then, there's an infinite ways to compress that file... You could come up with you own method, but what good is that? It's better and smarter to use a format already supported by your users

So of course most bundles are the same archive type under the hood. Everything from backups to installers - you shouldn't be inventing new formats without a damn good reason

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

A surprising number of "file formats" these days are really just zip files with a standard for the filenames and folders contained within. There's likely a ton of wonderful secrets like these to be found in the collective dataspace of humanity.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Imagine having the time to just do this. Lol I imagine I'd do the same thing, actually.