this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
79 points (97.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5197 readers
716 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who the fuck is not concerned about extreme heat at this point who is ANYWHERE near decision making

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

people paid to dismiss it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Bro... even if you're getting paid, you surely understand on SOME level at this point that what you're selling off is your grandchildren's future."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They need a VP with nationwide name recognition. Not this blah only their own state knows who they are crap.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Can you name some examples of recognizable people for you?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you don't know who Mark Kelly is, you've been living under a rock and likely don't read much. Kelly has made national headlines countless times.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yes ofc, but the other 3? It’s standard status quo for the last 50yrs, VPs with little to no name recognition. Like anyone knew who Hillary’s running mate was.

But sure, Mark Kelly. I still think the power couple ticket is Whitmer on the other half. But that’s probably too much progress for the so called progressive party.

Blast it, get Buttigeig or Whitmer on there. Then the excitement for the ticket will double.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

I understand your point, and I know that you’re not just limiting yourself to governors, but a lot of politicians with name recognition are assholes (I’m looking at you, Texas and Florida).

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I would love Andy Beshear to be the VP. He handled the Covid pandemic awesomely in KY and has been doing a lot of things for greener energy / extreme weather responses. Also, he values education and universal preschool. The only thing I fear is that if he does become VP, KY is going to choose a conservative governor that undoes all he has done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I would rather Beshear too, but mostly because I'm less worried about getting Kentucky having a Republican Govenor than I am about Arizona Senator Kelly getting replaced with a Republican Senator if Kelly becomes the VP pick.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

I suspect that the primary concern is whether a VP can bring a few more voters along in a swing state.