this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10163 readers
162 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i'm pretty confident you are not correct that it's too late; in any case, chill out a bit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your link says Biden may not be on the Ohio ballot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, that's correct. The article is from a month ago, where Ohio was trying to keep Biden off of the ballot due to DNC / state procedural bullshit.

Swap the candidate for someone else and surprise Pikachu when red states refuse to print them on the ballot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A. No need for name calling

B. It says there might be lawsuits and contests, not that the GOP has to allow it to happen. From the article:

It is possible for parties and election authorities to change or work around these deadlines. For instance, in 2020, the Republican National Convention took place after the deadlines in Alabama and Ohio. In Ohio, the state legislature passed a law to change the deadline that cycle so it took place after the Republican National Convention, and in Alabama, the state's election authority accepted a placeholder letter from the RNC that said the party would certify a nominee once the official nomination took place.

It is also possible that changing the Democratic nominee could draw lawsuits related to ballot access. On June 21, 2024, the Heritage Foundation said it would file lawsuits in Georgia, Nevada, and Wisconsin if Democrats nominated someone other than Biden.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If it is a red state, then they could simply refuse. You do realize that there were a couple of states that were trying to keep Biden off of the ballot using the existing deadlines as a method, right???

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-s-ballot-issues-in-ohio-aren-t-going-away-as-state-democrats-receive-another-urgent-warning/ar-BB1mROIb

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not only is that old, it's also a FoxNews article.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is 1 months old. It's also true. The DNC had to pull some fast changes in order to make it happen.

FOR BIDEN.

Do you want to rest on the good will of the politicians in red states for that "trust me bro" guarantee that your new candidate will be on the ballot?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, and those issue are resolved. Ohio passed legislation to push the date out and Alabama accepted a resolutution saying they would certify Biden. If the red states can refuse anyone, then they would just refuse Biden to begin with. There are legislative deadlines for these things, and all but one is after the DNC, so they would have to sue on very shakey ground. An article from a month does not prove that, it just means the source is behind or did not update the article.

  • Got Alabama and Ohio swapped
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

For BIDEN.

Exactly what do you think is going to happen when you try to swap in someone else? The Republicans are known for acting in good faith. I'm sure nothing bad would happen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please point to the place where I name called someone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's is not calling someone a name. Ffs. That is a descriptor.

"You are being naive"

Is not the same as

"Dumbass"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still an insult, which falls under name calling in my book

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Telling someone that they are being naive is not an insult. You should be old enough to understand that by this point in your life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Telling someone when they are being naive when they don't agree with you is an insult. It is meant to dismiss them with a hand wave.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You may find it insulting, but that doesn't mean it's incorrect and it most certainly is not name-calling.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As it stands right now, Biden could pull out (voluntarily) of the presidential race as early as this weekend. If that turns out to be the case, then there is a fairly good chance that VP Kamala Harris could run for POTUS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I feel as though you didn't watch the video. You should watch it.

There is one particularly insurmountable issue with that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I watched it. The fear of waffling instead of confidence. I get it. I understand. However, I'm just one person. In the end, the Democratic party will choose what to do. Personally, I believe that it would be disastrous to have Trump (and his cronies) in office again. So, my choice comes down to voting for whoever is the opponent of Trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Then you clearly were not paying attention because the number one issue is ballot access. It is too late. No other candidate can be on the ballots in many (if not all states).

That is a full stop no go right there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well then, I guess you should send the video to the DNC, since some YouTuber apparently knows more than the entire political apparatus that does this for a living and somehow doesn't know how anything about how elections work. Do you really think they would be stupid enough to change everything without first making sure their plan was even possible?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think THEY would be stupid enough, but this was aimed at helping the everyday folk, aka, you and me understand and think of the ramifications..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The two examples he gave have already been addressed by legislation in those states. There is no issue in any other state as far as I can tell.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How so? The legislation in those states has no mechanism for changing the ballots that I am aware of. You would run a significant risk of have ballots in multiple states with only Trump's name on them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The legislation extended the date of submission for the candidates to after the DNC. The ballots are not finalized until after that date as far as I can tell.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

And a million MAGA aneurysms were burst