this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2159 readers
11 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The pervasive mythology of American exceptionalism is essentially a religious doctrine positing that the US is essentially a perfect nation. Consequently, any issues arising within the system are perceived as external threats rather than inherent flaws. This mentality fuels the polarization between mainstream Republicans and Democrats, much like a religious schism. Both sides have a different interpretation of the doctrine and view each other as heretic traitors intent on destroying the nation.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This mentality fuels the polarization between mainstream Republicans and Democrats, much like a religious schism. Both sides have a different interpretation of the doctrine and view each other as heretic traitors intent on destroying the nation.

Nah, this is the only thing I can disagree upon

More or less, to me, regardless of what they do, nowadays, the mere partisan fight is a performance for voters...

Dem can't live without Rep, because the latter is the conservative boogeymen cow that they will milk marginalized urban demographics for...

Rep can't live without Dem, because the latter is the "progressive" version of that...

Either way, they get their coin in the drum, by both the voters, lobbyists, and the actual capitalist hands behind it

The last time they were serious about national heresy, it was in the Civil War, where Republicans were "progressive" and Democrats "conservative"

But, afterwards the more Lincolnite-Republicans acquiesced to Jim-Crow Democrats, in regards to the latter re-establish slavery by another name upon African Americans and populist settler agricultural hegemony, in exchange that Republicans continue their own industrialist and finance business...

it continues more or less the same, with switched modern faces in the 1960s we all know today

(A two-faced maneuver, you say that)

This is all before the concept of "external threats" that come from Global South was created as a concept.... which they accuse each other of...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I agree with that, I was referring to the actual voting base itself though. I imagine that the cult leaders on each side are generally aware of the game they're playing. It's also worth noting that polarization is necessarily becomes more pronounced as the economic conditions decline.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Incidentally, the notion of a constant external threat fits perfectly into this model. It's always external forces conspiring to tear down the beautiful city on the hill. Hence why we see constant accusations of people being puppets of Russia or China.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You'll probably be interested in this theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_civil_religion

Having grown up there I don't inherently disagree with this idea

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

oh yeah that's very much in line with what I was thinking

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah it feels pretty spot-on

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's an interesting point. I've been wondering, if the USA were to have a civil war, what would it be about? What are the ideological differences between the "Democrats" and "Republicans". But then I suppose there wasn't a massive difference between the Protestants and Catholics in European history.

Even their names, "Democrats" and "Republicans". Are the Democrats not Republicans? They do believe in a republic, likewise the Republicans at least nominally support what's called Democracy in the USA. Their names don't even describe them. What do they disagree about exactly? Just niche issues like trans rights?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Exactly, the rift is over social issues that are safe for for capitalists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The 15th to 19th centuries were full of bullshit wars against competing colonial powers just because of catholicism vs protestantism. I guess this is the modern Amerikan version.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

American foreign policy is essentially just age of sail imperialism but with "democratic" subbing in for "Christian".

"They're not Christian so we can kill them and take their stuff" has become "They're not democratic so we can kill them and take their stuff."

Also works on the next level because even if someone outside the European ingroup becomes democratic or Christian, that democracy or Christianity just becomes a lever of control for extractive economics.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Or you just accuse the democracy of not actually being a democracy, e.g. China

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago