this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Harry Potter

882 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

i mean, it's a british series set in britian by a british author with british characters speaking british english. why would they be saying 'parking lot' instead of 'car park'? that doesn't make sense!

and even at 8 i don't think i was so stupid that i couldn't figure out what an ice lolly was from context clues. furthermore, context clues are important for children to learn, not to mention dialects in general.

plus it seemed very inconsistent? some of the obvious slang they'd change but they'd leave in stuff like 'trainers' or 'snogging' in the US versions which confused me even more as a child because i was used to being spoon-fed the US vocab -- which doesn't immerse you in the setting as much and get you used to hearing the slightly different words as often.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

To not confuse US kids with spelling and the like?

Not sure though, would have been awesome if they left as-is and added foot notes or cliff notes for US version.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

the proper spelling of colour and neighbour

but for real i switch to the us version of the audiobook because jim dale > stephen fry (i just like how jim does more character work)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Some say Fry is not so good with his rendition of female characters' voices.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I prefer Fry, actually. I find Dale's reading a bit too intense, whereas Fry is much more relaxed.