this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
826 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I wouldn't mind the current President exercising this power over their political rivals, in the election, the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, purely as a defensive measure to protect America. It sets a shitty precedence, but do we really want He Who Shall Not Be Named to set the precedence first?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"It sets a shitty precedence.." is a gross minimalization to attach to effectively making the US be a dictatorship. And saying you're ok with a dictatorship because you happen to agree with the dictator is the kind of sentiment that cannot be left unchallenged/unexamined

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Right?

And it's incredibly short sighted.

So, in 4 years, will the next dictator be just as "good"? What about the next?

Also the whole "To save America" is literally the exact same reasoning used, and even believed, by the other side. It's circular at this point, one is better, but the other thinks THEY need to save America just as much.

It's a real fucked situation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The pres can now assassinate a billionaire and take all their wealth for themselves as an official act, and be immune.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This election will be the final free and fair one. God help us all

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

To do a "well, actually" I guess we didn't really have an empire until well past the country's founding. We were a mostly irrelevant backwater for some period of time.

ETA: And as someone who freaking loves this country, I realize that saying a comment like the above is one that could probably get you into a fight two days from now, most especially, when all kinds of fetishistic performative military nonsense and uncritical screeds about this country are at peak ridiculousness (and I love July 4th in spite of these flaws). I consider myself a real patriot, but one that is unwilling to whitewash this country.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago

No, the US has been an empire from the start. Unless you don't count conquering and colonizing the indigenous peoples because they aren't "civilized" or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I don’t think most civilizations start out in their final form. They typically start much smaller and grow.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't Biden write an executive order that describes what is "official" vs "unofficial"?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't the next president rip that order up and replace it with their own definition?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Too late. Biden made himself SCOTUS and changed back the rule, effective next term. Then replaced SCOTUS with the cast of Arrested Development.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

There's always money in the banana Republic

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

All this murder crap is lame; why has nobody been parroting how the president can do other crimes, like tax fraud or lie under oath or buying drugs or literally anything but murder?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

No, the murder isn't crap.

Biden can now murder the billionaires. Never mind the small fries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

literal killing if human beings is lame? we already know to white collar criminals are doing tax fraud and use drugs. old news.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Lame like an overbeaten dead horse, I mean. I was just trying to put out there that there's worse ways to try and ruin our country like Madoff did but worse. And plenty of others I didn't even mention.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

The President can fire employees that refuse to have sex with him. Firing executive branch employees is well within the President's power. If they don't submit to him, he can fire them. Official act.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Because the point is to scare you. "Breaking news president buys crack" is not as scary as "Breaking news president axe murders cabinet."

The ruling is not good, but it's not Seal Team Six executes its political rival bad. It's more likely to be President sells nuke secrets to Saudi Arabia under the new official "I Get to Sell Nuclear Secrets to Saudi Arabia Act" he just made up right now.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The president can also now legally dissolve the Supreme Court and instate a new supreme Court who can then make the decision if it was an official act or not.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

wash; rinse; repeat

load more comments
view more: next ›