this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

3470 readers
1 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

SELECT * FROM "GIRLS" WHERE good = yes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

That is really a shirt for SQL enthusiast. Now, I want to rebuild the database and write some convention for writing request.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

This is the most Indian shit I have seen this week.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

most infurating part of this is the mixing of cases

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Big pp energy over here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

This is not funny and any man wearing this would probably not pass a similar test using any woman's criteria. If I saw someone wearing this my first thought would certainly not be "hey this is a guy with a great sense of humor and I would like to hang with him!".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

~~and smallwaist = true~~

and itty_bitty_waist = true

and round_thing_in_your_face = true

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

is_sprung = true

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

It should be waist_size=1

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Gonna sound racist but deal with it.

I constantly meet asian developers (Singapore , India, China, etc) with this edgelord personality. They come to American conferences and meetups, say some wild sexist shit, and someone has to politely let them know not to.

Some backtrack. Some apologize. Some literally freeze up and pretend like it didn't happen.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

We do still live in a bubble in the west. We're fighting for equity across genders and race, while some parts of the world are still questioning if sexual harassment against women at work is really that big of a deal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Many of my guy coworkers have been (and are) sort of misogynistic, and homophobic (I'm in India). It makes me really uncomfortable. Might start reporting people to HR one day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Just get to know HR first. They might be mysogynists themselves (even if they are female).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

That last part is a face saving culture reaction. If you're feeling culturally sensitive the thing to do is just move on and see if they do it again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

ERROR: permission denied for "GIRLS"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Should be age > (my_age / 2) +7

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Found the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or (my_age - 7) * 2 < age < (my_age / 2) +7`

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Uh, no no. The rule is "half my age plus seven". I've no idea what your other term is supposed to represent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He’s saying it goes both ways. The upper limit is a women who you would be half her age plus 7.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

This "rule" only works for a small set of ages from 14 ~ 30ish

If you are 14 then the range for "age" is 14 - 14
If you are 30 then the range for "age" is 22 - 46
If you are 40 then the range for "age" is 27 - 66

At 30 the upper level is 16 years different; while it could work it is a big gap to bridge. It only gets worse the older you get.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why would there be an age and my_age column on the table GIRLS?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because for each girl you meet, you might tell her a different age.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Ah, but if we care at all about normalization and that's calculatable from the other columns (it should be) then it shouldn't be a column. Unless it's expensive and this is a view, of course.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good point.

Should be age > (@my_age / 2) +7

FTFOP - now my age is some value defined outside the immediate query.

More likely, the GIRLS would be a view of some table persons and you could query my_age from that table too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Thank you. I assumed the reader would be educated enough to guess I meant a variable. But yeah, should used @my_age

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Pretty sure "People who know enough about SQL to know about variables" is a subset of "People who know enough about SQL to be pedantic about it" :p

load more comments
view more: next ›