this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Humor

8215 readers
207 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules


Read Full Rules Here!


Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.


Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!


Rule 3: No spamming!


Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.


Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.


Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.


Please report any violation of rules!


Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.


We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

This doesn't belong in the humor community because it's seriously depressing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

they don't make em like they used to

good thing too, but those were fun to drive

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Every time I think about the kind of car I want the next time I need to replace mine I am reminded that I miss my old 1994 Chevy S10, and options for something like that these days is rather limited.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I really miss my tiny 1986 Toyota Corolla. My 2016 Prius is not supposed to be a big car and yet it is still bigger than that Corolla. Both sedans. If anything, the Prius should be smaller because it's a hatchback and those used to be the smaller cars.

At the time, the Corolla didn't feel small either. Every car is too big now except maybe Minis and Fiats.

My imaginary dream car would be an EV Nash Metropolitan. It's got 2 doors, a front and a back seat and a decent-sized trunk. I don't haul stuff, there's only three people in my family, I really don't need anything else.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Limited in the sense that there's literally no equivalent available today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

What sucks is you can’t even buy a truck like the second from the left anymore. I mean, you can buy a used one from a few decades ago, but nobody makes small utility trucks like the old Rangers. The new Ranger is basically just an old F150 (maybe even F250).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You can't buy one because it has never existed, no truck ever had a 40/60 cab to bed ratio except for custom jobs made from using the front of a van with a truck bed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Cab over engine trucks have existed for a very long time and have models that would absolutely have ~60% of their foot print be bed

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

CoE pickups haven't been a thing outside of commercial vehicles for decades, hell, the VW vanagon might have been the last one in the 80s for the North American market...

Look at the original post, none of them are CoE.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I love my 09 ranger, one of the last years before they scrapped it and went with the Goliath model.

Honestly don't see the appeal to the huge trucks unless they're for work, but it's not surprising that automakers in North America don't really care to offer what consumers actually want to drive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Maverick seems like a reasonable size to me, but by the time I need to replace another car, I'm sure its size will have inflated beyond what I want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I'm sure its size will have inflated beyond what I want.

I have the same problem with phones.

I assume there's some kind of growth formula I'm supposed to have learned about and started taking, but I don't go to the right parties. /sarcasm

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Reasonable footprint, but still a very short bed and 4 door cab. Don't get me wrong, I like the Maverick and expect to buy a 5 year old model in 5 years, but that's because I'll probably still be neck deep in home projects while still trying to commute. It does have great features in the bed and is known to have perfectly acceptable capability hauling full 4x8 sheets with the tailgate tilt. But most of the market is locked away in fullsize crew cabs with 6ft beds at best. 8ft beds typically require utility trims, so you can't get a smaller-footprint nice pickup with full capacity.

I've had a 99 ranger regular cab 7ft bed for about 2 months. It works great for me, but I can barely get a nicer home reno/commuter vehicle. I can go 10 years newer, but not much nicer comparatively speaking from 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Yeah, let's compare different types of truck so we can complain about them

Always the same shit with you guys

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›