Julian should have never been jailed.
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
417 points (97.9% liked)
World News
32285 readers
723 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not over yet.
Biden throwing a hail Mary to libs with a shred o conscience remaining for his trainwreck 2024. I mean it's about damn time but he should have been free years ago.
How many years would his prison sentence have been if he was extradided the year he fled to the embassy? I feel like he would have been out by now. Wasn't he leaking early Iraq war corruption stuff? That was 20 years ago.
No, they would have crucified him
He didn't leak, he published.
That's what's so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.
If precedent was set they could kidnap anyone from sovereign countries based on US law
He might have been epsteined though
IIRC he had some kind of insurance file against that, I think there used to be some encrypted file you could download from Wikileaks and if he died the password would be released.
No idea what it was (if anything, it could have just been a bluff of course) but it seems to have had the desired effect so far.
As a terrorist they could torture and kill him without covering anything up.
This might hurt future publishers of whistleblowers. Does this set the precedent that publishing info from whistleblowers can be prosecuted as espionage?
That's the goal.
I don't know the details of how the US legal system works but isn't a plea bargain essentially the same as a settlement in civil cases?
If so, it should (at least in theory) have very little prejudicial value since the courts did not rule on the question if Assange's culpability.
I know that in the real world the US regime once again learned that it can get away with murder and journalists all over the world have already learned the lesson that the evil empire will fuck them up if they air their dirty laundry. But from a legal nerd point of view a settlement should be quite useles as a precedent.
That sounds right
I mean, I was so sure they wanted to incarcerate him until he commits suicide!
Wow
Sounds like they got what they needed from him
What do you mean?
He pleaded guilty and agreed to delete "secret documents", whatever the hell that would be, as part of the deal
They wanted to make an example of someone. His thumbing his nose at the US government was well publicised, so they made their revenge on him very public too.
Instilled fear in potential future whistleblowers.
HANDS OFF
ASS
Isn't it great that a man who exposed governmental corruption and war crimes faced a harsher persecution and punishment than the corrupt governments and war criminals themselves?
Democracy™️
some petty bullshit making him plead guilty to espionage but 
Everybody will know that this is a forced confession anyways so who cares?
It does set a potentially dangerous precedent, but with how things are going (American newspapers declining in quality and SCOTUS selectively ignoring precedent and doing whatever), you're right that it doesn't mean much.
That’s what’s so concerning about the case. The USA tried to persecute an Australian citizen working out of the EU for publishing information.
As he is not a US citizen he was not able to use the X amendment to free speech.
America, after spending an insane level of resources and decades of man power to make someone say a phrase: HA! GOT EM!