For your Photoshop needs.
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1377 readers
152 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
… anymore*
I know adobe has particularly smooth brained execs but this seemed like a blatantly obvious bad idea. Adobe software is used by every big company and they do not have the resources to field five thousand lawsuits from everyone in the Fortune 500 simultaneously
"We have never trained generative AI on our customer’s content, we have never taken ownership of a customer’s work, and we have never allowed access to customer content beyond what’s legally required,” Wadhwani said to The Verge.
" yet..."
It's not even completely true. They did train their AI on Adobe Stock, which is royalty free, but is by definition customer content.
Holy shit. Thank you (and the author) so much for avoiding yellow/red/green icons. This is colorblind friendly!!
Very nice list, thanks for sharing. I hadn't heard of a lot of these.
I had them for a long time and they treated me like shit before the AI. I moved on a long time ago. Fuck you?
Was that the concern, though? I thought the controversy was that they intended to moderate people's projects. Or did they walk that back too once they renounced the reason for that policy (I.e., training AI)?
That they would/could access my work for any reason whatsoever… that they even have that ability, that’s not just a line in the sand for me, it’s the Grand Canyon. I expect any kind of cloud storage to be private and protected (e.g. encrypted at rest)… no back doors, no exceptions.
This is beyond the pale, and AI was never part of the concern.
That was also a concern, it's both.
Yeesh, they really dove into that with both feet eh?
We pwomise we're swawwy 🥺👉👈
Yeah, basically this.
People realized alternatives exist?
Affinity suite (designer, photo, and publisher) are pro level, pay to own, and much less expensive
Serif/Affinity got bought out by a pump'n'dump subscription company. We'll see if things hold true moving forward...
GIMP is the pimp!
What about for PDFs?
There's MuPDF or Okular
I've started a list of Adobe alternatives here!
Thanks, I will check them out!
GIMP can handle a lot of cases for PDFs. For more complicated cases, I would recommend Scribus.
Libreoffice Draw also works well for PDFs.