this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

WTF

4504 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Mod of the Forgotten Weapons community chiming in to explain. Iver Johnson revolvers featured a (at the time) new safety mechanism that prevented the guns from going off when dropped. I wouldn't recommend giving it to a baby though.

More famously they had a "Hammer the Hammer" ad series where they showed this off.

Post with more info: https://lemmy.world/post/10228746

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

That's a pretty sweet looking revolver though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

From the same era when heroin was sold as the non-addictive alternative to morphine. "Truth in advertising" wasn't a thing then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Truth in advertising" wasn't a thing then.

Is it a thing now?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

In theory, but then there's Goop and its ilk.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Accidental discharge impossible."

If only all those kids who shot themselves had better parents who bought "the right" gun.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

An accidental discharge is not a negligent discharge.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not a toy, but let your children play with it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I think this may have been an early prototype of the philosophy: "It doesn't matter what your advertisement says, it matters whether people remember it and are impacted by it." I'd be genuinely a little curious to find out how well this ad performed in practice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Between 1899 and 1908 ~700,000 were sold. But I'd attribute it more to a more successful campaign they ran called "Hammer the Hammer"

Link for info on that:

https://lemmy.world/post/10228746

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or you just lie to everyone about your product until someone proves you wrong or even tries to sue you for the death of a family member ... and even then, you fight any accusations as much as possible until you either win or are forced to pay penalties.

And once the costs of accidental deaths out pace the cost of lying about it all, then you can change your message or your product.

Ford Corp was famous for balancing the cost of recalls that could prevent deaths to litigation. The last time I read about it 20 years ago, the company had narrowed it down to valuing human life at about two million dollars. If litigation per person rose above that level, then it was cheaper to announce a recall.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Tyler Durden, is that you ?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Thank god we've improved our advertising philosophy since then........

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And finally solved the gun issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

* learned to better disguise our advertising philosophy

There are still kids in the houses that store the firearms being sold today

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

That seems like it's more on shitty parenting than something affected by advertising, no?